Domain of Square Root Function: Solving Inequalities for x ≤ -2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shaybay92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the domain of the square root function defined by the inequality 1/(x+1) - 4/(x-2) ≥ 0. The initial steps involved cross-multiplying and simplifying to arrive at the inequality -3(x+2) ≥ 0, leading to the conclusion that x ≤ -2. However, participants clarify that the domain is not limited to this restriction alone, as the function's behavior must be considered across its entire range. It is suggested to multiply by the square of the denominator to accurately determine the domain. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the domain extends beyond just x ≤ -2.
Shaybay92
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find the domain of a square root function... To do so I have to solve the following inequality:


1/(x+1) - 4/(x-2) >= 0

This is how i attempted to solve it...:

I crossmultilplied the denominator to get

[(x-2) - 4(x+1)]/(x-2)(x+1) >= 0

Multiplied both sides by (x-2)(x+1)

(x-2) - 4(x+1) > = 0

Expanded

x - 2 -4x - 4 = 0

-3x -6 >= 0

-3(x+2) >= 0

(x+2) <= 0 <---- at this point I am not sure if i swap the sign around, I haven't been taught inequalities before... but I will swap it around anyway.

x <= -2

Is this the correct answer? When I graph the entire function (sqrt of the above), I get part of the function less than -2 but also part greater than -2... I don't really understand how there can be x > -2 if I got this restriction here of >-2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When dealing with an inequality, if you multiply by a negative number, the inequality changes.

You can deal with this by multiplying by the square of the denominator

i.e. ((x+1)(x-2))2
 
Yeah, when I calculate it I get the same answer:

x <= (-2)
 
Just as rock.freak667 said, multiply both sides by (x+1)2(x-2)2. The domain is not just x <= -2.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top