Why are Some Genes Dominant Over Others?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2345qwert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genes
AI Thread Summary
Dominance in genetics refers to the relationship between different versions of genes, known as alleles, where one allele can mask the expression of another. This is not an inherent trait of the alleles themselves but rather how they interact. In the context of eye color, the traditional view of simple dominance is misleading, as eye color is influenced by multiple genes. Dark eye color alleles promote pigment accumulation in both the front and back layers of the iris, while light eye color alleles restrict pigment formation to the back layer only. This results in a scenario where the presence of dark eye color alleles leads to a more pronounced pigmentation effect, effectively overriding the lighter alleles. Understanding this complexity is crucial for grasping the nuances of genetic dominance.
2345qwert
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
What makes a gene dominant over another? Like why is the gene for brown eye dominant over the one for blue eyes? My teacher says it is "just like that" but I'm not so sure. IS there a reason for this?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
A quick note on terminology: rather than saying genes are dominant over others it's best to say that different versions of genes (called alleles) are dominant or recessive over other versions. Dominance is not inherent to an allele meaning that there is nothing special about any allele that determines whether it is dominant or recessive. Rather it's the relationship between alleles because in some cases the phenotype of one allele "overrides" that of the other.

In the case of eye colour it's complicated because whilst students are taught in school that it's an example of simple dominance it isn't. Eye colour is determined by multiple genes which makes it more complicated. Keeping it simple though to illustrate the concept it's important to understand that pigment in the eye can accumulate both at the front and back of the iris. Genes that give rise to dark eyes cause pigment to appear in both layers however genes that cause light coloured eyes only allow pigment to form at the back. So if you imagine that you have one allele saying pigment should be at the back and one saying pigment should be at the front and back you end up with pigment in both areas.

Does this make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ryan_m_b said:
A quick note on terminology: rather than saying genes are dominant over others it's best to say that different versions of genes (called alleles) are dominant or recessive over other versions. Dominance is not inherent to an allele meaning that there is nothing special about any allele that determines whether it is dominant or recessive. Rather it's the relationship between alleles because in some cases the phenotype of one allele "overrides" that of the other.

In the case of eye colour it's complicated because whilst students are taught in school that it's an example of simple dominance it isn't. Eye colour is determined by multiple genes which makes it more complicated. Keeping it simple though to illustrate the concept it's important to understand that pigment in the eye can accumulate both at the front and back of the iris. Genes that give rise to dark eyes cause pigment to appear in both layers however genes that cause light coloured eyes only allow pigment to form at the back. So if you imagine that you have one allele saying pigment should be at the back and one saying pigment should be at the front and back you end up with pigment in both areas.

Does this make sense?

Okay, but what causes this difference? I mean why do the genes for light eyes cause pigment to appear in just the back layer. And thanks for correcting my terminology!
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom
Back
Top