Donor and Acceptor Concentrations in a Si speciment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the donor ($N_D$) and acceptor ($N_A$) concentrations in a silicon specimen with n-type and p-type junctions. It confirms that gallium (Ga) and arsenic (As) atoms interact, leading to a correct donor concentration of $N_D = 2*10^{16} \text{cm}^{-3}$. Consequently, the acceptor concentration is also $N_A = 2*10^{16} \text{cm}^{-3}$, resulting in a total dopant concentration of $N_D + N_A = 4*10^{16} \text{cm}^{-3}$. This interaction between the dopants is crucial for understanding the electrical properties of the junction. Overall, the concentrations reflect the balance of donor and acceptor atoms in the semiconductor.
lelouch_v1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Suppose that we have a Si speciment and there are Ga atom impurities of $2*10^{16} \text{cm}^{-3} $.`Then, at the left side we insert As impurity atoms of $4*10^{16} \text{cm}^{-3}$. A pn junction is created. What are $N_D$ and $N_A$ at each side of the junction?
Relevant Equations
$$n = \vert{N_D - N_A}\vert$$
At the left side we have the n-side of the junction, whereas at the right we have the p-side. I am a little confused over $N_D$ and $N_A$ at the n-side. Do the Ga atoms interact with the As ones, so we have $N_D = 2*10^{16} \text{cm}^{-3}$, or not, ans thus we have $N_A=2*10^{16} \text{cm}^{-3}$ and $N_D = 4*10^{16} \text{cm}^{-3}$ ?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (202).png
    Screenshot (202).png
    30.7 KB · Views: 148
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Ga and As atoms do interact, so $N_D = 2*10^{16} \text{cm}^{-3}$ is correct. This means that there are two different types of dopant atoms on the n-side, one type is donors and the other is acceptors. The total concentration of dopants is then $N_D + N_A = 4*10^{16} \text{cm}^{-3}$.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top