Donor Impurities and the Forbidden region

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BOAS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impurities
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the forbidden region in semiconductors, particularly in the context of donor impurities and their effect on the band structure. Participants explore the implications of doping on the energy levels within the band gap and how this relates to the Hall Effect experiment they are preparing for.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the basic understanding of band theory, noting the positions of the Fermi level in conductors and insulators, and the temperature dependence of semiconductors.
  • Another participant clarifies that the band gap is considered a "forbidden" region only for the parent semiconductor, while dopants introduce separate energy levels within the band gap.
  • A participant questions whether adding an impurity changes the forbidden region, suggesting that electrons can be promoted into energy levels provided by acceptors, thus altering the perception of the band gap.
  • Another participant responds that the size of the band gap remains unchanged, but the dopant introduces energy states that facilitate charge carrier generation at non-zero temperatures.
  • One participant reflects on their misunderstanding regarding the boundary of the valence band and acknowledges that the dopant's energy level does not redefine the band gap but provides alternative pathways for electron movement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the introduction of dopants changes the nature of the forbidden region, with some asserting that the band gap remains constant while others explore the implications of new energy levels introduced by impurities. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conceptual understanding of the forbidden region in relation to doping.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on the implications of doping on the forbidden region, and there are varying interpretations of how the introduction of donor and acceptor levels affects the band structure.

BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19
Hello,

I am doing my prep work for the 'Hall Effect' experiment that I will be doing next week in labs and have a question regarding the forbidden region between the valence band and the conduction band. I haven't taken any formal solid state physics, but this is 2nd year lab, if that helps.

The description of band theory for conductors and insulators is easy to understand, with the fermi level being in the conduction band for conductors, allowing electrons to be in the conduction band when in the ground state, and the fermi level being in the valence band for insulators.

The energy gap between the conduction and valence band is small for semiconductors, which makes their properties highly temperature dependent. We dope the material in order to make it more useful.

N-Type Extrinsic semiconductors are doped with donor impurities that contribute electron energy levels high in the band gap and shifts the fermi level. It is now easy to elevate these electrons into the conduction band with an applied voltage, but I thought this 'band gap' was the forbidden region.

What is missing/wrong with this understanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BOAS said:
Hello,

I am doing my prep work for the 'Hall Effect' experiment that I will be doing next week in labs and have a question regarding the forbidden region between the valence band and the conduction band. I haven't taken any formal solid state physics, but this is 2nd year lab, if that helps.

The description of band theory for conductors and insulators is easy to understand, with the fermi level being in the conduction band for conductors, allowing electrons to be in the conduction band when in the ground state, and the fermi level being in the valence band for insulators.

The energy gap between the conduction and valence band is small for semiconductors, which makes their properties highly temperature dependent. We dope the material in order to make it more useful.

N-Type Extrinsic semiconductors are doped with donor impurities that contribute electron energy levels high in the band gap and shifts the fermi level. It is now easy to elevate these electrons into the conduction band with an applied voltage, but I thought this 'band gap' was the forbidden region.

What is missing/wrong with this understanding?

The band gap is a "forbidden" region only for the parent semiconductor. The dopant has a separate energy level.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
The band gap is a "forbidden" region only for the parent semiconductor. The dopant has a separate energy level.

Zz.

Thanks.

So, am I correct in thinking that the adding of an impurity effectively changes the forbidden region? Electrons from the parent semi conductor can now be 'promoted' into the energy levels provided by an acceptor, so this part of the band gap no longer seems to be 'forbidden' in the sense that electrons are not allowed to populate it.
 
BOAS said:
Thanks.

So, am I correct in thinking that the adding of an impurity effectively changes the forbidden region? Electrons from the parent semi conductor can now be 'promoted' into the energy levels provided by an acceptor, so this part of the band gap no longer seems to be 'forbidden' in the sense that electrons are not allowed to populate it.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "changes the forbidden region". The band gap remains the same (i.e. as in the size). The dopant simply has an energy state that happens to fall somewhere in the gap region, and the non-zero temperature allows it to add charge carrier to the semiconductor.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "changes the forbidden region". The band gap remains the same (i.e. as in the size). The dopant simply has an energy state that happens to fall somewhere in the gap region, and the non-zero temperature allows it to add charge carrier to the semiconductor.

Zz.

I was imagining that this new energy level became the boundary for the valence band, but I can see that this is mistaken.

The gap stays the same size, and the dopant adds an energy level somewhere in the gap, making the energy required to reach the conduction band (in a donors case) less, and provides an easy route for electrons to move from the valence band to the new energy level (in an acceptor case) creating holes, since it no longer has to jump all the way to the conduction band.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K