Don't close this please i beg you

  • Thread starter Thread starter chickenguy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a poll regarding the mathematical truth that 0.999... equals 1, with one participant expressing frustration over the perceived pointlessness of the vote. They argue that the topic is not controversial, suggesting the project should explore why some people deny this fact instead. Another contributor emphasizes the importance of context, noting that polling a mathematically informed audience may skew results compared to the general public. A mathematical proof is provided to demonstrate that the series converges to 1, reinforcing the argument that the topic has merit. The conversation highlights the intersection of mathematical understanding and public perception.

do you think that 0.999...=1

  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Don't know what u mean

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9
chickenguy
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Pleas Answer the POll and don't close the thread as my project is due very very soon
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fine. I voted "this is pointless" because you are trying to take a vote on something that is either true or false, and it happens to be TRUE. There is no doubt or controversy about it, so it doesn't make a very good project topic. I'm sorry to say it, but you should be looking into something else.
 
... unless the project is making a point of how unknown this TRUE fact is. Because personally I think it's rather interesting how many people would deny that .999... = 1. My only argument would be that to poll people from the Physics Forums, especially in the General Math section, is a bit innacurate as the voters are obviously more informed on the subject than the average person.
 
I few years ago there was a similar poll on Anatech forums. The result of over a 1000 votes was split about 60 - 40 with 40% getting it right.
 
Could anyone please put in any proofs to this thread and could you please explain this?

One can show that this limit is 9/10 + 9/100 + 9/1000 ... using Analysis, and a proof really isn't all that hard (we all believe it intuitively anyway); a reference can be found in any of the Analysis texts referenced at the end of this message. Then all we have left to do is show that this sum really does equal 1:

Proof: 0.9999... = Sum 9/10^n
(n=1 -> Infinity)

= lim sum 9/10^n
(m -> Infinity) (n=1 -> m)

= lim .9(1-10^-(m+1))/(1-1/10)
(m -> Infinity)

= lim .9(1-10^-(m+1))/(9/10)
(m -> Infinity)

= .9/(9/10)

= 1
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top