For context I'm looking at:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

http://www.mtnmath.com/whatrh/node80.html

Bell's theorem suggests that a hidden variable λ cannot exist, but, at least the version above makes the assumption that Λ (the set of all posible values of λ ) is a measurable domain s.t.

[tex]\int_{\Lambda} f(\lambda)d\lambda[/tex]

is well-defined.

Is there a version of Bell's theorem that does not rely on the ability to integrate the probability function of λ?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dopey Question about Bell's theorem.

Loading...

Similar Threads for Dopey Question Bell's | Date |
---|---|

I Do these Bell inequalities rely on probability concept? | Apr 13, 2018 |

I Measurement effect ('collapse') question | Apr 8, 2018 |

B Simple Question about of thermal radiation | Mar 24, 2018 |

I Question about charge | Mar 14, 2018 |

B Questions about Identical Particles | Mar 12, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**