- #1
- 2,454
- 7
For context I'm looking at:
http://www.mtnmath.com/whatrh/node80.html
Bell's theorem suggests that a hidden variable λ cannot exist, but, at least the version above makes the assumption that Λ (the set of all posible values of λ ) is a measurable domain s.t.
[tex]\int_{\Lambda} f(\lambda)d\lambda[/tex]
is well-defined.
Is there a version of Bell's theorem that does not rely on the ability to integrate the probability function of λ?
http://www.mtnmath.com/whatrh/node80.html
Bell's theorem suggests that a hidden variable λ cannot exist, but, at least the version above makes the assumption that Λ (the set of all posible values of λ ) is a measurable domain s.t.
[tex]\int_{\Lambda} f(\lambda)d\lambda[/tex]
is well-defined.
Is there a version of Bell's theorem that does not rely on the ability to integrate the probability function of λ?
Last edited: