Dot Product: Understand When to Use Each Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter mindheavy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dot Vector
mindheavy
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I'm reading up on dot products and keep seeing two different examples.

One states that u\cdotv = u_{i}\cdotv_{i} + u_{j}\cdotv_{j}

Another: u\cdotv = |u|\cdot|v|cosθ

I'm not understanding when to use the first or second method?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mindheavy said:
I'm reading up on dot products and keep seeing two different examples.

One states that u\cdotv = u_{i}\cdotv_{i} + u_{j}\cdotv_{j}

Another: u\cdotv = |u|\cdot|v|cosθ

I'm not understanding when to use the first or second method?
At the risk of stating something obvious, it depends on what information you are given and what you are trying to find. If you know the two vectors then you can find the dot product using the first equation. Then you can find the angle between the vectors using the second equation.

On the other hand, if you are given the lengths of the vectors and the angle between them, you can use the second equation to find the dot product.
 
Makes sense, I think the way the book I'm looking in words it was confusing me. Thanks
 
For example, if you are given that one vector is <1, 0, 0> and the other is <2, 2, 0> it is easy to calculate that the dot product is 1(2)+ 0(2)+ 0(0)= 2.

But if you are given that one angle has length 1, the other has length 2\sqrt{2}, and the angle between them is \pi/4, it is easiest to calculate (1)(2\sqrt{2})(cos(\pi&#039;4)= 2.

By the way, in spaces of dimension higher than 3, we can use the "sum of products of corresponding components" to find the dot product between two vectors, then use |u||v|cos(\theta) to define the "angle between to vectors".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top