Double ball drop and conservation of momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving two balls dropped simultaneously, where the goal is to determine the mass m that will stop the larger ball M after a collision. Participants explore the application of conservation of momentum, questioning whether gravitational forces can be neglected during the brief collision period using the impulse approximation. It is clarified that because the collision occurs over a very short time, the effects of gravity can be ignored, allowing momentum conservation to be applied. A suggestion is made that a clearer scenario would involve the balls on a frictionless surface, eliminating gravitational complications. The conversation emphasizes the need for justification in applying these principles in a non-closed system.
stfz
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The classic double ball drop question: a ball of mass m is placed directly above another ball of mass M, and assume that m is not negligible. Both balls are dropped simultaneously. Find the mass m such that, upon the second collision (m with M), M has a final velocity of zero.

Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum
Elastic collision assumed.

The Attempt at a Solution


Here, probably my only question is how to justify applying conservation of momentum to the collision. My reasoning is that conservation of momentum shouldn't apply because there is an external force on the two-ball system (gravitation). However, from what I know of the 'impulse approximation', we can treat the background forces (i.e. gravity) as negligible given that the collision occurs across a very short period of time? We can then work with momentum conservation over an infinitesimal time interval? (i.e. the effects of gravitational acceleration on momentum of the system may then be ignored)
Is that the correct reason for why it may be applied? Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You refer to a second collision being between the two balls. What is the first collision?

Also, if the final velocity of M is zero and it's in a gravitational field, it must be supported by something. What is supporting it?
 
Sorry about that. Here's the full question:
A small ball of mass m is aligned above a larger ball of mass M (with slight separation) and the two are dropped simultaneously from a height h. Assume the radius of each ball is negligible relative to h.
(a) If the larger ball rebounds elastically from the floor and then the small ball rebounds elastically from the larger ball, what value of m would result in stopping the larger ball when it collides with the small ball?

My questions were as above - in this non-closed system (force of gravitation), are we using the impulse approximation to make gravitational forces negligible relative to the collision forces? The method of solving this question (according to a Google) is to equate momentum. I'm personally inclined to doing that too, but I need to be able to justify it.

Thanks!
 
stfz said:
My questions were as above - in this non-closed system (force of gravitation), are we using the impulse approximation to make gravitational forces negligible relative to the collision forces? The method of solving this question (according to a Google) is to equate momentum. I'm personally inclined to doing that too, but I need to be able to justify it.
Yes, the collisions are presumed to take an unknown but very short time, so gravity can be ignored for their duration.
 
  • Like
Likes stfz
A much clearer version of this problem would be one in which the balls are masses sliding collinearly on a frictionless surface and M then undergoes an elastic collision at right angles to a wall. That takes gravity out of the equation.
 
  • Like
Likes stfz
Yes this makes sense. Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top