Double integral in polar coordination

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on evaluating a double integral using polar coordinates, specifically addressing the integral I = ∫∫_R f(x,y) dA, where dA = r dr dθ. Participants confirm the correctness of the integration process and emphasize the importance of proper range selection for the variable r. The conclusion drawn is that the ranges provided in the original problem are accurate, as they align with the polar-coordinate transformations of the Cartesian equations y = x tan(θ) and y = x². The negative result from the textbook is deemed incorrect due to the nature of integrals summing positive quantities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integrals in calculus
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and their transformations
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and identities
  • Experience with evaluating integrals in multiple dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conversion of Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates in integrals
  • Learn about the properties of definite integrals and their ranges
  • Explore the implications of integrating non-negative functions
  • Review examples of double integrals in polar coordinates for better comprehension
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians working with integrals, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of polar coordinate integration techniques.

rado5
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



attachment.php?attachmentid=28536&stc=1&d=1285509290.jpg


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Please tell me if I am wrong. I suspect about the ranges. Are my range corrrect?
 

Attachments

  • Double integral in polar coordination.jpg
    Double integral in polar coordination.jpg
    30.7 KB · Views: 566
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rado5 said:
Please tell me if I am wrong. I suspect about the ranges. Are my range corrrect?

If you have a double integral on the form I = \int \int_{R} f(x,y) dy dx
Then if you to integrate using polar coordinates then it changes to
I = \int \int_{R} f(x,y) dA where

dA = r dr d\theta

trying adding this and see if you don't get the right result.
 
Dear Susanne217,

Thank you very much for your reply, but i have already added dA = r dr d\theta
to get the result. If you calculate it you will see that I had already added it! But my problem is the ranges. I suspect about the ranges.
 
The quantity you integrate (that is '1') is always positive.
An integral is basically a sum, so a sum of positive terms cannot turn into something negative.
The result of the book (1-\sqrt2 \cong -0.41) is negative, so it is wrong.

=\int_0^{\pi/4} \int_{0}^{\frac{sen\theta}{cos^2\theta}} dr\: d\theta

=\int_0^{\pi/4} {\frac{sen\theta}{cos^2\theta}} \: d\theta

=\left[{\frac{1}{cos\theta}\right]_0^{\pi/4}

=\sqrt2-1

Your result is ok.
 
Last edited:
Quinzio said:
The quantity you integrate (that is '1') is always positive.
An integral is basically a sum, so a sum of positive terms cannot turn into something negative.
The result of the book (1-\sqrt2 \cong -0.41) is negative, so it is wrong.

Thank you very much for the notification about "positive". But would you please tell me what your idea is about the ranges? especially about the ranges of "r". Are you sure that my ranges are correct?
 
Yes they are correct because in a polar-cartesian system:
the system
y = x tg\theta
y = x^2

gives x = tg\theta

r = \sqrt(x^2+y^2)= tg\theta \sqrt(tg^2\theta+1) = tg\theta / cos\theta = sen\theta / cos^2\theta
 
Dear Quinzio,

Thank you very much for your help.
 
attachment.php?attachmentid=28541&stc=1&d=1285528782.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Double integral in polar coordination 2.jpg
    Double integral in polar coordination 2.jpg
    24.9 KB · Views: 538

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K