Double Integral: [(x2) + y)]1/2 - Solution & Fubini Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter quietrain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a double integral of the function \([(x^2) + y]^{1/2}\) over a specified region with limits for \(dx\) and \(dy\). The context includes the application of Fubini's theorem and considerations of continuity for the function within the defined limits.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the possibility of using trigonometric identities and substitutions to solve the integral. There are attempts to understand how to apply Fubini's theorem and questions about proving the continuity of the function over the specified rectangle. Some participants suggest exchanging the order of integration and rewriting the inequalities for clarity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants providing guidance on visualizing the integration region and clarifying the limits of integration. There is acknowledgment of the challenges in integrating the function in its current form, and some participants express uncertainty about the continuity proof and the correct approach to setting up the integral.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of accurately determining the region of integration, particularly in relation to the curves defined by the inequalities. There is mention of needing to adjust the limits of integration when changing the order of integration, and some confusion exists regarding the correct interpretation of the shaded region in a graphical representation.

quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


evaluate the double integral

[(x2) + y)]1/2 dxdy

where dx goes from y(1/2) to 2
dy goes from 0 to 4

The Attempt at a Solution



i read a few sources that seems to say i have to use trig identities to solve such problems, but i don't seem to be able to do it here since y is present.
i can't find a suitable substitution too.

on a side note, if i want to proof fubini theorem to be true, am i suppose to show that the function [(x^2) + y)]^1/2 is continuous across the rectangle specified by the limits? so how do i show that in this case?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try exchanging the order of integration. The region over which you're integrating is given by

[tex] \sqrt{y} \leq x \leq 2[/tex]

[tex] 0 \leq y \leq 4[/tex]

Can you rewrite these inequalities so that you integrate w.r.t. y first?
 
er, if i want to integrate wrt to y first, i just have to apply fubini theorem right? but how do i proof that that function is continuous in the rectangle specified by the limits?

and also, if i integrate wrt y first i get

integrate 2/3 (x2+4)3/2 - 2/3(x2)3/2 dx

but how do i integrate that x term :O

i would probably need a suitable trigo subsitution?
 
Oh, you can't just switch the order without changing the limits of integration (especially since one of the limits for x is a function of y!). Draw a picture of the region using the inequalities in my first post, and then you should be able to see another way to rewrite the inequalities.

It's pretty easy to show that this function is continuous (depending on what you've already seen), but I'm not sure you need to worry about proving continuity for the moment. Fubini's theorem basically just states that we can use iterated integrals to solve this problem.
 
oh so the region i want is a y=x2 graph?

but the region is enclose by the y=4, y-axis and the y=x2 right?

so i have to integrate from 0 to x2 dy, and then 0 to 2 dx

then i use the rectangle area to minus the above integral to get the desired region?
 
is it this?

integral.jpg
 
There's a small mistake in your picture: double-check which part you should be shading. For instance, the point (0,1) shouldn't be in the shaded region since [itex]\sqrt{y} \leq x[/itex].
 
oh, so its the other region

so i should just take away the 8 - , then the rest is right?

thanks!
 
Sounds good! Now you just have to integrate. It should be much easier integrating w.r.t. y first.
 
  • #10
thanks!
 
  • #11
You're welcome! It's very common to find double integrals that are very difficult to integrate in one order, but quite simple using the other.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K