Schools Double Majoring for Grad School: Physics & Math?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decision-making process of a physics undergraduate considering a transition to engineering, particularly aerospace engineering. The individual is contemplating a double major in math due to their proficiency in the subject but is concerned about the additional time and costs associated with out-of-state tuition. They express a strong interest in practical applications of engineering, particularly in renewable energy, sparked by a competition involving solar energy homes. The conversation highlights the differences in focus between physics and engineering, noting that engineers often have multiple research interests, while physicists tend to specialize. Participants encourage pursuing a path aligned with personal interests and strengths, emphasizing the importance of enjoying the chosen field, whether it be physics or engineering. The consensus suggests that a solid foundation in math is beneficial for both disciplines, and the decision should ultimately reflect the individual's passions and career aspirations.
oksanav
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I'm sure some of this has already been answered, but I'm going to go ahead and ask. I'm a physics undergrad but I might want to go into engineering for my masters. My math teacher kind of talked me into double majoring, because math comes so easy to me, but I'm still not sure, because it'd mean another semester and I've switched majors so much that I have a lot of extra hours already and I'll be charged out of state tuition if I'm not careful. I was wondering how much better double majoring would look compared to just having a lot of math, if I choose to go into engineering.
Secondly, I'm kind of confused about engineering. The thing that interested me is a show I saw where grad students were in a competition designing/building houses that run completely off of solar energy. I thought this was neat, because though exploring astronomy is fun, I'm very much a "make stuff" and design kind of person ( I was an art major before I switched to physics). From the research I've done, solar energy is generally under the mechanical engineering department, but this isn't entirely consistent. I'm from Texas but I'm hoping to go to Univ. of Alberta, so I've been e-mailing them, but I thought I'd ask here too.

So anyways, my physics profs try to encourage physics, and my math profs encourage math. I thought an outside view would be helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you like astronomy and like building things I would say going for Aerospace Engineering... but I am just an undergrad that isn't 100% sure about everything lol. I am going for Aerospace engineering starting this fall. I have had some science and math before changing majors at my prior college but I haven't had much experience. So I guess I am saying don't make a decision off of what I think haha. Hopefully I have helped some though.
 
Thanks! One cool thing I noticed while looking at grad school websites is that most engineers have more than one research interest, and one guy had 3 totally different interests, one of them working on stuff for exploring Mars. Astronomers tend to focus on one area though. Which makes me lean towards engineering.
 
yeah, the Mars rovers is actually what sparked my interest in Aerospace Engineering. I did a paper on them along with a few other robotic systems in space, and as I did I decided to change my major. Luckily I ended up writing that paper my freshman year first semester lol.
 
i am a math prof and we encourage math because we love it (and we need more warm brains in our program). but you have to live with it, so go with what you love. but physicists do use a lot of math, so if physics is your thing take as much math as feasible.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top