Double Potential Well: Wave Function & Forces

michael879
Messages
696
Reaction score
7
I remember this homework assignment I did a while back, where we "found" the wave function of a particle in a double potential well. The distance between them was variable and we found that as the distance decreased, the energy of the system went down. This would suggest a force pulling the two wells together right? I know this doesn't explain repelling forces at all, but wouldn't this "work" as an explanation of a force like gravity? treat composite particles as potential wells, and quarks as particles with a wave function that extends to all the other wells (its incredibly small everywhere but the particle its in). Particles made of quarks would feel a weak attractive force to each other.

I doubt this actually works to explain gravity, and maybe the quark example is ridiculous since their wave function is pretty confined. However, anything that acts a well would have this attractive force wouldn't it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No it's a question of overlap of wave functions in the barrier region, which becomes significant if the distance between the wells decreases (or the barrier is low).

\Psi(x)=c_1\Psi_1(x)+c_2\Psi_2(x),

where Psi_1 and Psi_2 are local (approximative) solutions to the "uncoupled" problem, but with some decay into the barrier (like gaussian, for instance).

The penetration of the wave function into the finite barrier add an extra energy:

\Delta E =V_{barr}\int_0^L \Psi^2(x)\;dx,

where L is the thickness of the barrier.

The electron does not interact with itself! There is no such term in the Hamiltonian. If you have many electrons you would have to include Coulomb interaction of course.

/Per
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top