Double slit interference from antenna

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interference pattern produced by electromagnetic radiation from an antenna when passed through a double slit apparatus. It is suggested that the pattern would resemble that of other wave sources, such as visible light or electrons, rather than being limited to just two regions of destructive interference. The Feynman path integral formulation indicates that multiple crests and troughs contribute to the interference pattern, leading to a more complex result than initially proposed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding classical electromagnetism before addressing the quantum aspects of the problem. Overall, the interference pattern is expected to be similar to that produced by other wave phenomena.
Danyon
Messages
83
Reaction score
1
Consider the situation where the electrons in an antenna accelerate from the top of the antenna to the bottom of the antenna once, what would the interference pattern look like if the electromagnetic radiation from the antenna were passed through a double slit apparatus of an appropriate size? I imagine there would only be two deconstructive interferences in the interference pattern, is this wrong? The feynman path integral formulation seems to imply there would be more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe it would look identical to the double slit pattern from any other source, be it visible light, electrons, or water waves.
 
Drakkith said:
I believe it would look identical to the double slit pattern from any other source, be it visible light, electrons, or water waves.
The number of regions that interfere deconstructively depends on how many crests and troughs there are, for my described scenario there should be one trough followed by one crest, which should result in only two regions which interfere deconstructively. Feynman's path integrals only seem to work with waves that have multiple crests and troughs
 
A single pulse of electromagnetic radiation is a superposition of plane waves of various frequencies, so you have multiple crests and troughs here; you do the sum across all frequencies on all paths to get the final amplitude.

You need to be able to work this problem using classical E&M before you can take on the quantum version.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Nugatory said:
A single pulse of electromagnetic radiation is a superposition of plane waves of various frequencies, so you have multiple crests and troughs here; you do the sum across all frequencies on all paths to get the final amplitude.

You need to be able to work this problem using classical E&M before you can take on the quantum version.
I see, thankyou.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
543
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
797
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K