Doubt in chemical equilibrium question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the chemical equilibrium of the reaction N2(g) + O2(g) ⇌ 2NO(g) and the corresponding equilibrium constants (Kc) at various temperatures. The participant argues that a higher Kc indicates a higher concentration of NO, leading to the conclusion that the highest concentration of NO occurs at the highest Kc value, which is at 2300 K (option E). However, the textbook claims the correct answer is option A, which contradicts their reasoning. The participant suggests that the problem likely assumes consistent conditions across the scenarios, with temperature being the only variable affecting Kc. Ultimately, they assert that the book's answer is incorrect and reaffirm their belief that the correct answer is E.
pc2-brazil
Messages
198
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



For the chemical equilibrium N_{2(g)} + O_{2(g)} \rightleftharpoons 2NO_{(g)} , the following values were found for the constant Kc (chemical equilibrium constant), at the indicated temperatures:
(The table is attached as an image)
Code:
Table in text format:
    Temperature (K)    Kc (10^-4)
I   1800               1.21
II  2000               4.08
III 2100               6.86
IV  2200               11.0
V   2300               16.9
There is higher molar concentration of NO(g) in:
a) I
b) II
c) III
d) IV
e) V

Homework Equations



General form of the formula for finding the chemical equilibrium constant with respect to the molar concentrations of the reagents and products at the state of equilibrium:
K_c = \frac{[P]^p}{[R]^r}
Where P are the products of the chemical reaction, R are the reagents, [] denotes molar concentration (mol/L) and p and r are the coefficients of each product and reagent in the chemical equation.

The Attempt at a Solution



The expression for the equilibrium constant of the given reaction is:
K_c = \frac{[NO]^2}{[N_2][O_2]}
Where [X] denotes molar concentration of X.
As the concentration of NO, [NO], gets bigger, the fraction with [NO]2 as numerator also gets bigger; so, Kc gets bigger.
Then, the situation where Kc is the biggest should be the one with the highest concentration of NO. In this case, the answer would be letter E) V, since, in V, Kc equals 16.9.
So, the correct answer should be E (the highest Kc).
But the book says the correct answer is A (the smallest Kc), not E.
What is wrong with this reasoning?
Thank you in advance.
 

Attachments

  • pf.GIF
    pf.GIF
    4.7 KB · Views: 523
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you shown all information? Are you perhaps told something about volume of the reaction vessel? Is it the same mixture each time? Was it started with known amount of substances?

And why do you think "a" is a correct answer?

--
methods
 
Borek said:
Have you shown all information? Are you perhaps told something about volume of the reaction vessel? Is it the same mixture each time? Was it started with known amount of substances?

And why do you think "a" is a correct answer?

Thank you for the answer.
Yes, that is all the information of the problem.
We weren't clear at the end: we think the correct answer is E (for the reasons explained in the message, that is, from the equilibrium constant expression, higher Kc means higher [NO]), but the book says it is A.
NOTE: Although the problem didn't tell anything, it is probably the same mixture each time, and temperature is the factor which is changing Kc and shifting the equilibrium of the reaction. We also assume that the volume remains the same.
 
Last edited:
We have just confirmed that the answer given in the book is wrong... It is actually E, just as we thought.
Thank you for your patience.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top