Drake Equation: Parameters, Missed Factors & Technical Limits

  • Thread starter Thread starter toph
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Drake Equation and its parameters, questioning whether any crucial factors have been overlooked. Participants express skepticism about the quantifiability of the parameters and suggest that Drake may have missed important considerations, such as the stability of planetary systems. The impact of distance on detection methods and current technical limitations in estimating parameters are also highlighted. There is a consensus that the equation may not fully capture the complexities of life beyond Earth. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a broader understanding of the factors influencing the existence of intelligent life in the universe.
toph
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am not sure if this is in the correct forum, please move if required. I know this equation is not really suited to this forum but i think a discussion about some of the Drake equations parameters are.

First please see,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_Equation

If unsure of what Drakes equation is.

Please disregard the fact that most/all of the values for the given parameters are unquantifiable. My interest in this is not so much the discussion that inteligent life may exist beyond Earth, but more towards the parameters Drake chose for his equation and whether you think any are misguided or just plain wrong!

My questions in relation to this are,
1) Do you think this equation misses out any parameters? if so what?

2) Given that distance will be a major factor in any detection method, are there any current technical limits that restrict estimating the given parameters?

3) If there is a missing parameter and its value was zero then the probability of life beyond Earth is also zero, can you think of anything that drake may have left out that would give a null value?

4) If you could ask Drake one question about his equation what would it be?

Thanks for your comments
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think Drake left a wholle world of paparmeters out of his equation partly because they are unanswerable or because he just couldn't imagine them.

We do not know, all these decades after Drake wrote, what are the true boundaries of life or the actual parameterization of the totally unknown requirements for the rise of technology-using life. So the whole Drake effort to parametrize our ignorance looks to me like a mug's game.
 
selfAdjoint said:
I think Drake left a wholle world of paparmeters out of his equation partly because they are unanswerable or because he just couldn't imagine them.

This is the crux of what i was considering, what parameters do you think he missed out?

i think he missed out a parameter for the fraction of planetary systems with a stable planetary system.

i.e no planetary migration.

Is this even a consideration?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top