• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Drawing flow lines of an irrotational and sourceless flow

  • Thread starter d2j2003
  • Start date
  • #1
58
0

Homework Statement



Draw flow lines of f(x+iy)=x^2-y^2+2ixy

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the flow is irrotational and sourceless by Cauchy Theorem but I don't know how to draw the flow lines... I'm thinking I might have to parameterize the equation and go from there? Any help is appreciated
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
312
0
This is strange. f(z)=z^2 is certainly analytic, but curl[x^2-y^2,2xy]=4y in the z direction, certainly not irrotational. Did I make a mistake?
 
  • #3
58
0
I used Cauchy Theorem to integrate around closed curve (unit circle) which is equal to 0... I thought this meant that it was irrotational and sourceless (at least locally), maybe not globally though. The book says to integrate the conjugate.. so (x-iy)^2 and if it is 0 then it is irrotational and sourceless..
 
  • #4
312
0
I guess f(z) integrated along a curve on the complex plane is different from the vector field [real{f(x,y)}, imag{f(x,y)}] integrated along a curve in the R2 plane. So your sourceless and irrotational assertion are both incorrect.
 
  • #5
58
0
what did I do wrong? and how should I go about it?
 
  • #6
312
0
what did I do wrong? and how should I go about it?
let f(z)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y), f(z)dz=(u+iv)(dx+idy)=udx-vdy+i(vdx+udy), while [u,v].[dx,dy]=udx+vdy, obviously different. However, Conjugate(f(z))dz seem to recover the vector field integral correctly...
 
  • #7
58
0
so what happens if we do use the conjugate? it is sourceless and irrotational right?
 
  • #8
58
0
ok so I went back and tried to do it using green's theorem.. but then it shows that the function is not irrotational and not sourceless.. so something must be wrong because it must be 1 or both of these... i'm guessing maybe I missed a negative sign somewhere or something..
 
  • #9
58
0
looks like it is neither irrotational nor sourceless.. so no streamlines are necessary (i guess)

is this correct? Or can I still draw streamlines?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
312
0
looks like it is neither irrotational nor sourceless.. so no streamlines are necessary (i guess)

is this correct? Or can I still draw streamlines?
You can certainly draw streamlines. If there's curl. You'll see closed loops. If there's divergence, you'll see streamlines converging into a sink or diverging from a source. They can coexist. A streamline is nothing but a curve whose tangent is in the same direction as the vector field at the same point. You can parameterize the curve and solve some DE for it, but I suspect there's an easier way for your problem, because it is a homework problem, I suppose?
 

Related Threads on Drawing flow lines of an irrotational and sourceless flow

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
919
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
Top