Drift velocity formula derivation confusion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of drift velocity in conductors, specifically comparing two equations: vd = (eEτ)/2m and vd = (eEτ)/m. The first equation is derived using the kinematic equation s = ut + (1/2)at2, while the second uses v = u + at. The consensus is that the first equation is more appropriate for calculating average velocity in the context of electron motion, although classical mechanics can be applied under certain conditions as outlined by the Drude model, which underpins Ohm's Law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in classical mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Drude model of electrical conduction
  • Basic knowledge of electric fields and forces on charged particles
  • Concept of average velocity in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Drude model and its implications for electrical conductivity
  • Explore quantum mechanics principles relevant to electron behavior in conductors
  • Learn about the differences between classical and quantum mechanical approaches to particle motion
  • Investigate the application of Ohm's Law in various materials and conditions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and researchers interested in the behavior of electrons in conductive materials and the application of classical mechanics in modern physics.

swap1996
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In the derivation of drift velocity i have seen two variations and want to know which one's correct.
  • s=ut +\frac{1}{2}at^{2}
    Assume that the drift velocity of any electron in any conductor is :
    v_{d}=l/t
    Due to the electric field the acceleration of electrons in any conductor is:
    a=eE/m
    Now the distance traveled by an electron after a long time (initial thermal velocity = 0)
    l=\frac{at^{2}}{2}
    the time between the collisions is τ ∴
    l=\frac{eEτ^{2}}{2m}
    thus the velocity is
    v_{d}=\frac{eEτ}{2m}

  • In another proof i saw the author using v=u+at⟹v_{d}=\frac{eEτ}{m}
My question is which of the the two equations of motion can be used in the proof? Can they be used at all.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since we are talking about 'average velocity' so the former derivation would be appropriate.However i don't think using classical mechanics for finding the velocity of particles like electrons would be appropriate,i think this requires quantum mechanical approach.
 
projjal said:
Since we are talking about 'average velocity' so the former derivation would be appropriate.However i don't think using classical mechanics for finding the velocity of particles like electrons would be appropriate,i think this requires quantum mechanical approach.

It is appropriate when the limits of the validity of such an approach is taken into account. The Drude model is based on such an approach (which is where we get the beloved Ohm's Law). So it is valid whenever appropriate.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
603
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K