Dropping a magnet through the moon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ghostcrown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet Moon
AI Thread Summary
Dropping a magnet through a tunnel lined with copper wire on the moon would generate current due to the changing magnetic field. If the coil ends are open-circuited, the magnet could oscillate indefinitely without losses. However, if connected to a load, back-emf would slow the magnet's movement, eventually causing it to stabilize at the center of the coil. This process would allow energy extraction equivalent to the magnet's initial gravitational potential energy, minus inefficiencies. The scenario illustrates principles similar to common physics demonstrations involving Lenz's law.
Ghostcrown
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Let's say we built a tunnel through the (arbitrary) center of the moon, and lined the surfaces of the walls with millions of loops of copper wire. If we dropped a massive magnet in through the moon, would it produce a substantial amount of current due to the magnetic field passing through the wire, and keep going back and forth due to gravity? And would it be worth it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ghostcrown said:
Let's say we built a tunnel through the (arbitrary) center of the moon, and lined the surfaces of the walls with millions of loops of copper wire. If we dropped a massive magnet in through the moon, would it produce a substantial amount of current due to the magnetic field passing through the wire, and keep going back and forth due to gravity? And would it be worth it?

If the coil ends were open-circuited, then there would be no losses and the magnet would keep oscillating between the surfaces of the moon.

If the coil ends were connected to some load resistance (like a generator), then the back-emf would slow down the passage of the magnet on each oscillation on each pass, with the end result of the magnet stationary in the middle of the coil at the center of the moon, and you have extracted an amount of energy from the coil corresponding to the initial Gravitational Potential Energy of the magnet when released at the surface of the moon (minus inefficiencies).

Makes sense?
 
You might produce a current, but the magnet will not come out to the same distance again. It will simply get stuck in the middle relatively fast.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top