Dwight's vs. Burlington's Mathematical Data book?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison between two mathematical reference books: "Tables of Integrals and Other Mathematical Data" by Herbert Bristol Dwight and "Handbook of Mathematical Tables and Formulas" by Richard Stevens Burlington. The original poster is considering purchasing Dwight's book after finding Burlington's edition at a library sale. Participants in the discussion express that while both books serve similar purposes, Dwight's book is well-regarded and has been beneficial for their studies. There is a suggestion that both texts may be nearly equivalent, but the specific contents and usefulness of Dwight's book could justify its purchase for those needing comprehensive integral tables and mathematical data. Overall, the consensus leans towards Dwight's book being a valuable resource in mathematical studies.
TLeit
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
My quantum physics professor this semester showed us a useful book he had with tables of integrals, etc. in it called "Tables of Integrals and Other Mathematical Data" (4th edition) by Herbert Bristol Dwight. I have been considering buying this book from Amazon but was waiting because today was the local public library's book sale and they often have old science and math books there, and I was able to pick up "Handbook of Mathematical Tables and Formulas" (5th edition) by Richard Stevens Burlington. Is this book essentially equivalent to Dwight's or is there important stuff in Dwight's book that would make it worth still buying at some point? Are there any opinions on which book is better? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd imagine they are nearly equivalent. I have a copy of Dwight 4th ed. which has served me well in my studies. I've never used Burlington.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top