Dyna result doesn't match Test result

  • Thread starter Thread starter lambertlai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Match Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on discrepancies between simulation results from LS-DYNA using the MAT_024 material model and actual tensile test results for steel. The user followed a detailed process to convert engineering stress and strain into true stress and strain, then plotted the results. However, the simulation's maximum stress of approximately 0.5 GPa at a strain of 0.3 does not align with the lab test's maximum stress of about 0.37 GPa for the same strain. The user seeks clarification on potential mistakes in their modeling approach and the differences between true stress versus plastic strain and engineering stress versus strain. Understanding these discrepancies is crucial for accurate material modeling in simulations.
lambertlai
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I try many time to model a simple tensile test for steel MAT_024 but the graph doesn't match from Dyna result and Test result.
Process:
1. Collect data Tensile strain and stress convert to True stress and strain use formula True stress: eng. stress*(1+eng. strain). True strain= ln(1+eng. strain) and then the true strain convert to plastic strain = true strain - (true stress / Young modulus) and plot the graph
389954639.jpg


2. Use MAT_024 from dyna
389954647.jpg

389954647.jpg

3. Then I extract nodout and sec force.
389954850.jpg

LN1 is left node 1 (triangle on left)
RN1 is right node (triangle on right)

4. Eng stress= Force/Ao and eng. strain= delta Length / original length and plot the graph. (original area is 40, original length is 45mm)
389954524.jpg

389954523.jpg

389954525.jpg


Then the both result was different, why? What the misstake? Anyone can help me solve this problem?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
In the first figure, when you define the stress x plastic strain for the material, the maximum inputed value is around 0.5GPa for a strain of 0.3, but when you show the lab test stress x strain graph in the last figure, the maximum stress is around 0.37GPa for the same strain.
 
The 1st figure is a plastic strain vs true stress as a input, is it right?
if true stress vs strain and lab test strain stress the max. stress is different right?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top