Dynamics Moments - Linear Algebra / Cross Product

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the equation G = mvn, where G represents momentum and n is a unit vector in the direction of velocity. The user seeks clarification on how to derive G from the components involving angles and unit vectors, specifically how n relates to (cosθn_x + sinθn_z). There is also a request for an intuitive explanation of the concept of 'moment' in dynamics. Responses suggest focusing on the book's narrative for concrete examples and recommend reviewing the properties of the vector cross product as outlined in the text. The conversation emphasizes the importance of following established guidelines for seeking help in academic forums.
udtdewclaw
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Some background: I am self studying dynamics and I have encountered a fundamental problem with either my understanding of linear algebra, or I am just plain dumb. So, I print screened the page of the book we're on. Now let me try to reduce some ambiguity in my question, I have a general understanding of the cross product and unit vectors. With this question it's stating the G is the momentum of the particle is G = mvn, where n is the unit vector in the direction of velocity. When we try to take the moment of the position vector from O to P with the momentum we get, M(G/O)[G with respect to O] =p(P/O) ×G=p(Q/O) ×G

=y_0*n*y ×m*v*(cosθn_x +sinθn_z)

=m*v*y0(sinθn_x −cosθn_z). * indicated multiplication, obviously.

My question is, how does G = mvn, => G = mv(cosθn_x +sinθn_z) or more specifically, how does n = (cosθn_x +sinθn_z) and further deductions until the end result. And can someone explain intuitively what a 'moment' is? I would like a full explanation of these mathematical deductions if possible.

Here is a link to the book: Fundamentals of Applied Dynamics - Tenenbaum

http://f3.tiera.ru/2/P_Physics/PC_Classical%20physics/PCtm_Theoretical%20mechanics/Tenenbaum%20R.A.%20Fundamentals%20of%20applied%20dynamics%20%28Springer,%202004%29%28ISBN%20038700887X%29%28O%29%28730s%29_PCtm_.pdfHere is a screenshot of the page of the book also, Fundamentals of Applied dynamics - Tenenbaum - Page 33.
rz5Hg.png
I also have a post on math.stackexchange asking the same question however, stack exchange has a latex version of the equations for easier reading, here is a link
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/641029/cross-product-moments-dynamics
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wonder why Tenenbaum had to introduce notation that nobody understands and that is different from mainstream texts on mechanics.

The result follows by using the properties of the vector (cross) product. Re-read Appendix A and make sure you do the exercises.

It is probably a little early to explain what "moment" is generically. It will confuse you even more. Just stick with the narrative of the book for now, it should give you more concrete examples of moments shortly.
 
voko said:
I wonder why Tenenbaum had to introduce notation that nobody understands and that is different from mainstream texts on mechanics.

The result follows by using the properties of the vector (cross) product. Re-read Appendix A and make sure you do the exercises.

It is probably a little early to explain what "moment" is generically. It will confuse you even more. Just stick with the narrative of the book for now, it should give you more concrete examples of moments shortly.


Okay thanks, can you go to my stack exchange thread and tell me if I figured out my first question ( question A) correctly, I posted my solution to it at the bottom of the post.
 
I suggest that you go to the Homework Help forum and start a thread there, and post your attempt at the solution there. That is how it works here, doing it the way you want is uncommon and may be against the rules here.
 
voko said:
I suggest that you go to the Homework Help forum and start a thread there, and post your attempt at the solution there. That is how it works here, doing it the way you want is uncommon and may be against the rules here.

Okay thanks.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top