Dynamics relative acceleration question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the relative acceleration of two aircraft, A and B, where A is flying in a straight line and B is in a circular holding pattern. Participants explore the equations of motion and the implications of circular motion on acceleration, focusing on the correct interpretation of acceleration vectors and their directions.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Participant 1 presents the problem and attempts to calculate the acceleration of aircraft A relative to B, questioning the correctness of their calculations.
  • Some participants assert that the acceleration of A relative to B is indeed 2.469 m/s², suggesting that rounding errors may have occurred in the calculations.
  • There is confusion regarding the conversion of speed from km/h to m/s, with participants discussing the correct method for this conversion.
  • One participant states that aircraft A is not accelerating, prompting further discussion about the implications for the relative acceleration calculation.
  • Participants debate the direction of the acceleration of aircraft B, with some suggesting it should be represented as negative due to its circular motion.
  • There are suggestions to draw diagrams to clarify the direction of the acceleration vectors for both aircraft.
  • The concept of centripetal acceleration is introduced, with references to forces acting on objects in circular motion, leading to further exploration of how to represent these accelerations mathematically.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct representation of the acceleration of aircraft B or the implications for the relative acceleration of A. Multiple competing views on the direction and calculation of the accelerations remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the motion of aircraft A and B, as well as the definitions of acceleration in circular motion. The mathematical steps for determining the relative acceleration are not fully resolved.

beccawalker
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Aircraft A is flying NorthWest at 800km/h. Aircraft B is flying in a circular, anticlockwise holding pattern, radius of 5km, at 400km/h.Show that the acceleration of A relative to B is

A(A/B)= 2.469cosθBi+2.469sinθBj m/s2

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that aA/B = aA - ab and that a=v2/r

I changed 400km/h into 2.47m/s (multiplied by 1000 and divided by 360) and used it with the 5000m radius to get an acceleration of 2.47m/s but I’m not sure if this is correct or not? I don’t know how to get the acceleration of A.

I know that aA = |aA|cosθAi + |aA|sinθAj and I know the same equation applies for aB and for aA/B

If anyone can tell me if the acceleration I have worked out is correct or not that would be great and also how to work out the acceleration of A that would be very helpful, thank you:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2.469 is the correct answer as provided in the question. Make sure you don't have a rounding error with your 2.47.

What you say you "used it with the 5000m radius", how did you use it.

I presume you mean divided by 3600 rather than 360
 
Stephen Hodgson said:
2.469 is the correct answer as provided in the question. Make sure you don't have a rounding error with your 2.47.

What you say you "used it with the 5000m radius", how did you use it.

I presume you mean divided by 3600 rather than 360
Thank you for responding! Yeah I meant I divided by 3600 rather than 360. What happens to the acceleration of A? As it is the acceleration of A relative to B so I thought I would need to use the equation AA/B = Aa - Ab?
 
But A is not accelerating?
 
beccawalker said:

Homework Statement


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
I know that aA/B = aA - ab and that a=v2/r

I changed 400km/h into 2.47m/s (multiplied by 1000 and divided by 360) and used it with the 5000m radius to get an acceleration of 2.47m/s but I’m not sure if this is correct or not? I don’t know how to get the acceleration of A.

A speed of 400 km / hr is not equivalent to 2.47 m/s. When you convert 400 km / hr to the correct speed in m/s and use it with a radius of 5000 m, you get an acceleration of 2.47 m/s2 [note the units].
 
The m/s was a typing error, I meant m/s2 :) As A is not accelerating then using the equation aA/B = aa - ab = 0cos135i + 0sin135j -2.469cosθBi-2.469sinθBj
= 0 + 0 -2.469cosθBi-2.469sinθBj
=-2.469cosθBi-2.469sinθBj m/s2
Which is negative of the answer I'm trying to get? Is the acceleration negative due to B flying in an anticlockwise direction?
 
why is ab necessarily 2.469cosθi+2.469sinθj ? Draw a diagram of B and take a look at the direction the acceleration is pointing.
 
Snapshot.jpg
The acceleration is going anticlockwise, making it negative and so ab = -2.469cosθi - 2.469sinθj ?
 
You've drawn on the path it takes. Draw on the acceleration.
 
  • #10
Snapshot2.jpg
Is that what you mean? If not, then I'm not really sure what else it could be
 
  • #11
Aha. There's the hole in the understanding!

If something is moving in circular motion (e.g. I'm whizzing round a ball on a string) In which direction do you think the acceleration will be in? (Think about the forces on the ball)
 
  • #12
Or think about the forces on the Earth orbiting the Sun
 
  • #13
The Earth accelerates towards the sun which results in a centripetal force on the earth?
 
  • #14
Exactly! for circular motion, the acceleration is always towards the centre of rotation.

So now you can redraw the diagram with acceleration. Think about how you could parametrise the acceleration in terms of θ
 
  • #15
Snapshot3.jpg
Is this the diagram you meant? Because the acceleration of B is into the centre of rotation, does this make the acceleration negative and so when I use the equation aA/B = aa - ab this gives me the correct answer?
 
  • #16
So if you wanted to write the position vector of B in terms of r and θ, how would you do this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K