E and H pattern of 2 element antenna array.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the E and H patterns of a two-element antenna array consisting of Hertzian dipoles oriented in the z-direction, spaced \(\frac{\lambda}{2}\) apart. The user successfully derived the H pattern using the equation for the array factor but encountered unexpected results when attempting to calculate the E pattern at \(\phi=0\). The derived E pattern does not yield zero as anticipated, indicating a misunderstanding of the relationship between the E and H patterns in this specific configuration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hertzian dipoles and their orientation
  • Familiarity with antenna array theory and pattern multiplication
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinate systems in antenna radiation patterns
  • Proficiency in mathematical manipulation of trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of E and H patterns for two-element antenna arrays
  • Learn about the implications of array factor in antenna theory
  • Explore the relationship between E and H fields in antenna radiation
  • Investigate the effects of varying \(\alpha\) and \(\phi\) on antenna patterns
USEFUL FOR

Antenna engineers, RF engineers, and students studying electromagnetic theory who are interested in understanding the complexities of antenna array patterns and their mathematical derivations.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
This is not a homework, too old for that! I just have a question that I create myself. All the books only show the pattern that is more obvious...they show either the E or the H pattern. I took an exercise that asked for the H pattern, in turn, using the pattern multiplication to try to find the E pattern and ran into road block. Here is the exercise:

Given two Hertzian dipoles oriented in z-direction. Both line up on x-axis and [itex]\;d=\frac {\lambda} 2 \;[/itex] apart. Both are driven by the same amplitude and phase [itex]\alpha =0[/itex]. Find the E and H pattern.

From pattern multiplication:

[tex]|E(\theta, \phi)| = \frac {E_m}{R_0}\;| F(\theta, \phi)|\;\left|\cos\left(\frac {\beta d \cos\phi \sin\theta -\alpha} {2} \right)\right|[/tex]

Where [itex]\;| F(\theta, \phi)|= |\sin\theta| \;[/itex] is the element factor for the Hertzian dipole of each element and [itex]\;\left|\cos\left(\frac {\beta d \cos\phi \sin\theta -\alpha} 2 \right)\right|[/itex] is the array factor.

The pattern function is:

[tex]| F(\theta, \phi)|\;\left|\cos\left(\frac {\beta d \cos\phi \sin\theta -\alpha} {2} \right)\right|[/tex]

I have no problem getting the H pattern by just putting [itex]\;\theta=\frac {\pi}{2}[/itex]. I get the two almost ball shape one on +ve y-axis and one on -ve y axis. There are no E field on x direction as expected.

But when I try to look at the E pattern at [itex]\;\phi=0[/itex], I don't get what I expected. From the H pattern above, I expect I'll get no E field at [itex]\;\phi=0 \;\hbox { and } \phi=\pi[/itex] for all angle of [itex]\;\theta[/itex]. But according to the pattern function:

[tex]| F(\theta, \phi)|\;\left|\cos\left(\frac {\beta d \cos\phi \sin\theta -\alpha} {2} \right)\right| = |\sin\theta| \left|\cos\left(\frac {\pi}{2}( \sin\theta ) \right)\right|[/tex]

You can see it is zero when [itex]\theta= 0 \;\hbox { or }\;\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex], but it is not zero in between. Can anyone help explaining this?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Anyone?

I know the equations are correct as it is given in the book and was used to solve the H pattern. Far as my understanding, array pattern is not E or H pattern dependent, in fact it is not antenna elements dependent. It only depend on the [itex]\theta, \phi, \alpha, d[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K