E & B field phase relationship in EMR

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phase relationship between the electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields in electromagnetic radiation (EMR), examining theoretical implications from Maxwell's Equations and Faraday's law. Participants explore the nature of these fields in both free space and near radiating structures, as well as the gradual transition between different field behaviors.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that common diagrams depict E and B fields as being in phase, but questions this based on Faraday's law, suggesting they should be 90 degrees out of phase.
  • Another participant counters that solutions to Maxwell's Equations indicate that E and H fields are indeed in phase in free space, while noting that near fields exhibit different behavior.
  • A participant seeks clarification on the gradual transition between near and far fields, asking for an explanation or terminology related to this phenomenon.
  • One participant corrects a misunderstanding regarding Faraday's law, explaining that it pertains to the curl of the E field rather than the E field itself, asserting that E and B fields must be in phase for sinusoidal plane waves.
  • Discussion includes the observation that the rates at which the fields reduce differ, with the radiating field falling off at 1/r, while near fields exhibit different fall-off rates for E and H fields.
  • Another participant notes the surprising directions of the fields near a dipole compared to those in a plane wave, indicating a complexity in visualizing these relationships.
  • A participant expresses a lack of understanding of the responses and indicates a need for further learning.
  • There is a mention of uncertainty regarding the fall-off rate of the reactive H field, suggesting it may not always follow a consistent pattern close to the source.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the phase relationship of the E and B fields, with some arguing for a 90-degree phase difference based on Faraday's law, while others maintain that they are in phase according to Maxwell's Equations. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the transition between near and far fields, as well as the complexities of field behavior near radiating structures. There are also unresolved questions regarding the specific fall-off rates of the fields.

ChrisXenon
Messages
60
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
Shouldn't they be 90 degrees out of phase?
Common diagrams for the magnetic and electric field components of EMR show the fields at right angles in space with peaks aligned along the axis of propagation, for example Wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation.

However, Faraday's law says the E field depends on the rate of change of the B field. At it's maximum the B field's reate of change is zero, and so the E field should be zero. So the peaks should not coincide. The E field peak should be wheredB/dt is max - which is when B is passing through zero. So the fields should be 90 degrees out of phase.

No?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChrisXenon said:
Summary: Shouldn't they be 90 degrees out of phase?

No?
No. The solutions to Maxwell's Equations produce a free space wave with E and H in phase.
Right next to a radiating structure, the fields (near field) will be in quadrature but there is a gradual transition from one situation to the other as distance increases over the first few wavelengths (or more).

It bothered me, too, at one time when comparing EM waves with mechanical waves, in which the interchange between Kinetic and Potential energy produces peaks of displacement and velocity which are, indeed, in quadrature - so the flow of energy is constant. Not the case with EM.
 
sophiecentaur - thanks. What a luxury to have easy and near-instant access to such knowledgeable people.
If I could prevail upon your good nature again - is there an easy explanation of why this gradual transition takes place? Or even thename of a phenomenum without the explanation? What is it that puishes this gradual transiation?
 
ChrisXenon said:
Faraday's law says the E field depends on the rate of change of the B field. At it's maximum the B field's reate of change is zero, and so the E field should be zero.
This is slightly wrong in a very important way. Faraday’s law actually says ##\nabla \times E=-\partial B/\partial t##. So it is not the E field itself that depends on the rate of change of the B field, but the curl of the E field which is a spatial derivative. So Faraday’s law says that the spatial rate of change in the E field is proportional to the temporal rate of change of the B field.

For a sinusoidal plane wave the zero crossing is both the greatest temporal change and the greatest spatial change. So the E and B fields must be in phase.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tech99 and sophiecentaur
ChrisXenon said:
is there an easy explanation of why this gradual transition takes place?
The fields reduce at different rates. The Radiating Field falls off at 1/r. The near fields are 'reactive'; the E field falls off as 1/r2 and the H field falls off as 1/r3. Have look at this link as a starter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory
Not only are the local fields not what you'd expect but the actual directions they point can be a bit surprising. Looking at the top end of a simple dipole. the E field near its axis is pointing the opposite way to the radiated field (as with the field lines around a bar magnet which point 'up' at the pole and 'down' at points out towards the sides). The situation with a plane wave out in space is a lot easier to visualise. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Thanks for your replies guys. I found I'm not knowledgeable enough to understand them so I'll need to do some learning but I appreciate your time & effort.
 
sophiecentaur said:
The fields reduce at different rates. The Radiating Field falls off at 1/r. The near fields are 'reactive'; the E field falls off as 1/r2 and the H field falls off as 1/r3. Have look at this link as a starter.
Not sure the reactive H field always falls with 1/r^3. If you are close to the wire, the field tends to initially fall off as 1/r. This is confusing, because the radiated magnetic field does the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K