E-field between insulator and conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field (E-field) between a grounded conductor and an insulating slab above it, both extending infinitely. The conductor induces a negative charge density on its surface due to the positive charge density of the insulator. The participant attempts to use the principle of superposition to find the total E-field by separately calculating the contributions from the conductor and the insulator. However, they encounter a problem when the E-field below the conductor appears to be non-zero, which contradicts the expected behavior of a grounded conductor. They seek clarification on whether the principle of superposition applies in this scenario and how to correctly approach the problem.
ross
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a slab of conductor on the ground with thickness, a, and it extends in all directions infinitely. Then I have a slab of insulator above the conductor of thickness, a, and it also extends infinitely in all directions. The two slabs are a distance, 2a, from each other. The conductor is grounded. The insulator has some charge density p. It induces a charge density of -pa on the top surface of the conductor. The bottom surface of the conductor has zero charge density. The question assumes the E-field is always in the z-direction, and asks for the E-field for all values of z. Note that the situation is in electrostatic equilibrium.

Homework Equations



none really..

The Attempt at a Solution



I decided to split up the question into two parts: find the E-field due to the conductor for all z values, assuming the insulator isn't there.. then find the E-field due to the insulator, assuming the conductor isn't there.. then by the principle of super-position, add them up, and have the answer.

For conductors I know that eE = D, where e is epsilon, E is the E-field strength, and D is the surface charge density. So above the conductor, the E-field is E = (-pa)/e pointing up. The E-field within and below the conductor is zero.

For the insulator, I found the E-field above it to be E = (pa)/(2e) pointing up, below the insulator to be E = (-pa)/(2e), and within the insulator to be E = (p(z - 3.5a))/(e) pointing up.

My main question is in regards to below the conductor, because when I add up the E-fields generated by both the insulator and conductor, I get an E-field below the conductor, which I know is not possible. Is there some concept I'm missing here? Does the principle of superposition not work here? Maybe it's because the conductor is grounded? If possible, could you start me down the correct path for sovling this..? or just correct where I went wrong?

Thanks a bunch.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone know?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top