E field calculations for continuous charge distributions

AI Thread Summary
Calculating electric fields for continuous charge distributions involves leveraging symmetry, expressing charge in terms of charge density, and validating results at large distances. The third point emphasizes that as the distance (r) from the charge distribution increases, the system should approximate a point charge, aligning with Coulomb's law. If the calculated electric field does not converge to this expected behavior at large r, the result is likely incorrect. Understanding this concept helps ensure the accuracy of electric field calculations. Properly applying these principles is crucial for mastering electrostatics.
kiwibird4
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
so I was reviewing my textbook on calculating electric field when we can assume a continuous charge distribution and they said three useful tools are
(1) making use of symmetry
(2) expressing the charge dq in terms of charge density lambda
(3) and checking the answer at the limit of large r which serves as an indication of the correctness of the answer -- if result does not check at large r, your result has to be wrong (giancoli textbook).

Anyway, I understand the usefulness of 1 and 2 but do not fully understand what number 3 is talking about or how to check the answer in that way? Can anyone explain further what they are referring to or maybe give an example
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For example, if you're calculating the electric field around a ring or disc or sphere or something, then you should expect that for ##r## that are very far away, since the object will look essentially like a point, the electric field equation should look like coulomb's law for a point charge.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top