E-field inside a non-conducting hollow pear.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aesteus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E-field
AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field inside a hollow non-conducting pear with a varying surface charge density, the discussion emphasizes the use of symmetry and Gauss's law. The charge density is zero at the top and 600 C/m^2 at the bottom, leading to the conclusion that the electric field inside the pear can be determined by superposition of fields in the x, y, and z directions. It is noted that due to the lack of enclosed charge within the hollow region, the electric field is zero overall, although the z-component may be non-zero. The approach suggests that applying Laplace's equation could be beneficial, but the primary conclusion rests on Gauss's law. Understanding the implications of the charge distribution is crucial for accurately determining the electric field.
Aesteus
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the electric field inside a hollow non-conducting pear with a surface charge-distribution (axially symmetric too) of σ(r,θ). The charge density σ is zero at the top of the pear, and 600 C/m^2 at the bottom.

Homework Equations



I'm not sure how to approach the problem ... maybe some application of Laplace's equation.

The Attempt at a Solution



The electric field at any point inside the pear will be the superposition of x,y, and z fields. I assume that we can use symmetry about the z-axis to our advantage.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, it's just a simple application of gauss' law on the inside of the object yielding E=0 because there is no enclosed charge. (And E-z is non-zero I believe.)
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Electric field external to Conducting Hollow Sphere with charge inside
Replies
23
Views
3K
What does having 3d symmetry 2d symmetry and 1d symmetry mean?
Replies
36
Views
2K
Charged Conducting Sheet v. Charged Non-Conducting Sheet
Replies
9
Views
2K
(Help) Surface charge density (σ) for particle to hit plate...
Replies
4
Views
977
Charge density in sphere that makes constant radial E-field inside
Replies
14
Views
1K
Find charge inner/hollow sphere
Replies
2
Views
2K
Magnetization of a paramagnetic sphere
Replies
11
Views
1K
Electric field above a disk that equals half the max electric field
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Electric Field Inside a Hollow Sphere
Replies
5
Views
1K
Why is electric field at the center of a charged disk not zero?
Replies
4
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top