E=mc^2, Gravitational Potential & Energy Balance

CaptainSlog
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If two masses that are separated by a distance are created from pure energy using the equation E=mc^2, where did the gravitational potential energy between them come from? Does this mean the speed of light isn't really constant, and must be changed very slightly to accommodate it? Could it be that gravity itself is necessary to balance energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing two concepts that do not really go together, namely gravitational potential, which is a concept from classical mechanics, and mass energy equivalence, which is a concept from relativity.

In order to make sense of this, you need to apply general relativity. In GR, mass is not the source of gravitation. Instead, the energy-momentum tensor is and any type of energy is therefore a gravitational source. It is not that you can simply create a new gravitational source out of nothing.
 
  • Like
Likes CaptainSlog
OK, thanks. I had always assumed gravity was due to mass, but if mass and energy are equivalent then that makes sense.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
991
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top