E=mc^2, Gravitational Potential & Energy Balance

CaptainSlog
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If two masses that are separated by a distance are created from pure energy using the equation E=mc^2, where did the gravitational potential energy between them come from? Does this mean the speed of light isn't really constant, and must be changed very slightly to accommodate it? Could it be that gravity itself is necessary to balance energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing two concepts that do not really go together, namely gravitational potential, which is a concept from classical mechanics, and mass energy equivalence, which is a concept from relativity.

In order to make sense of this, you need to apply general relativity. In GR, mass is not the source of gravitation. Instead, the energy-momentum tensor is and any type of energy is therefore a gravitational source. It is not that you can simply create a new gravitational source out of nothing.
 
  • Like
Likes CaptainSlog
OK, thanks. I had always assumed gravity was due to mass, but if mass and energy are equivalent then that makes sense.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
954
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top