E8 theory according to the dark matter and energy

DaniV
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
Does the E8 theory that offered and posted by Antony Garrett Lisi,can explain the qualities and the source of the dark matter and dark energy in the universe?
 
  • Like
Likes BiGyElLoWhAt
Physics news on Phys.org
Check out this thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...with-3-generations.821322/page-3#post-5173314

Garrett was recently discussing his current work in that thread. It was just last month. Several other people were asking him questions and he was replying. You could post a question in that thread and Garrett, or one of the others, might reply.

Or if you scan through the discussion there you might find your questions had been partially answered.

Just a comment: you might be well-advised to remain a bit skeptical about the phrase "dark energy".

So far the evidence supports the idea of a cosmological (curvature) constant. With no clear indication that it arises from any type of energy. So far the observations are consistent with there simply being a constant term (a curvature which Einstein called Lambda) in the Einstein GR equation, and that constant not being zero.

The evidence for dark matter, on the other hand, is fairly solid. It has been observed by its gravitational lensing effect---concentrations of clouds of dark matter have been measured and mapped etc.

A unified model of geometry and matter, like Garrett's, needs to have a place for dark matter particle(s), but it would not need to have a place for any kind of "dark energy" in order to fit observations. A simple cosmological constant---a nonzero asymptotic expansion rate---would suffice.

PS: I looked at Garrett's new paper, on pages 15 and 36, and it seems to me that he has this non-zero asymptotic expansion rate in his model. He calls it alpha. I just now posted about this in that earlier thread, where they were discussing. You can go there if you want. That would be a very clear organic way to include Einstein cosmological constant Lambda.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes garrett
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top