Earliest Homo erectus fossil dated

  • Thread starter Thread starter pinball1970
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    homo
AI Thread Summary
Recent findings from South Africa have revealed H. erectus fossils dated to 2.05 million years, predating the previously oldest known fossils from Georgia by 200,000 years. This dating coincides with a significant magnetic reversal that occurred 1.95 million years ago, which was utilized in dating the surrounding sediments. The study suggests that multiple hominin populations, including H. erectus, coexisted during this period, challenging previous assumptions that H. erectus had already left Africa. Researchers emphasize the importance of cautious language in scientific discourse, noting that claims of "no evidence for X" reflect a careful approach, contrasting with the more definitive statements often made in popular media.
pinball1970
Gold Member
Messages
3,504
Reaction score
5,529
TL;DR Summary
This paper in science last week https://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6486/eaaw7293.full

Suggests that three archaic hominins, Homo erectus Australopithecus and Paranthropus found at Drimolen cave in South Africa between 2015-18 were contemporaries.
The previously oldest H. Erectus fossil was dated 1.85 million years from Georgia.
These specimens from South Africa have been dated 200,000 years earlier, pre dating a magnetic 'flip' that occurred in the Earth's magnetic field 1.95 million years ago.
This magnetic reversal was one of part of one of the techniques used on the surrounding sediments.
This study has implications regarding migration and competion models of these hominins who were contemporaries according to the dates.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, jim mcnamara, Astranut and 1 other person
Biology news on Phys.org
One of the take-away concepts is that there were three sympatric populations of hominins, including H. erectus. Prior to this study, H. erectus was thought to have left Africa. Due to lack of evidence. It is not possible to assert that something categorically does not exist without testing absolutely every possibility - I guess in this case digging up a continent for fossils.

So researchers use statements like 'no evidence for X' when they are being careful. Magazine writers not so careful.
 
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
16K
Back
Top