Early Fission Device: History & Recreate Info

  • Thread starter Thread starter basics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Device Fission
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the historical context of the 1938 nuclear fission discovery by Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann, highlighting the experimental apparatus used. This apparatus, rather than being a single device, consists of a table with various equipment for bombarding uranium with neutrons. The goal of the experiment was to create heavier elements, but it unexpectedly resulted in the splitting of the uranium atom. The conversation also touches on the complexities and dangers of recreating such experiments, requiring natural uranium, radium, and beryllium, along with specialized detection equipment. Ultimately, the significance of Lise Meitner's contribution in interpreting the results is emphasized, marking a pivotal moment in nuclear chemistry.
basics
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...pparatus_1938_-_Deutsches_Museum_-_Munich.jpg

Hello everyone. According to Wikipedia, this is a photograph of the experimental apparatus with which Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann discovered nuclear fission in 1938. Unfortunately this is not enough information for me. I was just wondering if anyone could possibly take the time to explain to me exactly what is, what it does, and if it is possible to recreate one for a project (purely as a hobby, not school related at all). Thanks for your time!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's not a device, but a table with experimental apparatus placed on it. It's the equipment used by H and S to bombard uranium with neutrons. This was a continuation of experiments performed earlier by Fermi who bombarded several different substances with neutrons and discovered artificial radioactivity. H and S were attempting to make elements with atomic numbers greater than 92 by bombarding uranium with neutrons, but instead or making heavier elements, their experiments split the uranium atom.

This is a broad strokes description of the experiment:

http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2013/nuclfission.html

http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Develop...ear_Chemistry_The_Discovery_of_Fission_(1938)

Basically, you would need samples of natural uranium (which hasn't had the U-235 isotope separated) and radium and beryllium, two substances which are expensive (radium) and dangerous to handle (both). H and S used Geiger counters specially built to detect radiation during the experiment and used a fair amount of chemistry to identify the fission product. H and S did not understand what was going on with their experiment until after Lise Meitner reviewed the experimental findings and told them they had split the uranium atom instead of creating trans-uranic elements.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Back
Top