Earth-Sun Vector, Ecliptic to Equatorial Coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting Earth-Sun vectors from ecliptic coordinates to equatorial coordinates for an astrophysics project using Python. The user seeks clarification on whether changing the reference plane to "Earth mean equator and equinox of reference epoch" will achieve this conversion. Additionally, they request guidance on the mathematical or Python methods for converting vectors from equatorial to ecliptic coordinates, emphasizing the importance of using the precise obliquity of the ecliptic, measured in arc seconds. The tilt of the ecliptic relative to the celestial equator is specified as 84381.448 arc seconds, which is crucial for the rotation transformation. The thread highlights the need for accurate coordinate transformations in astrophysics programming.
science.girl
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
I'm writing some code in Python for an astrophysics project, and I need some help. The JPL Horizons website gives the earth-sun vector in the default reference plane "ecliptic and mean equinox of reference epoch". I need to convert this vector (3 vectors, actually, reproduced below) into equatorial coordinates.

R1 = vector(-1.578367764168768E-02,1.016223492126721E+00,-2.062339622509254E-05)
R2 = vector(-1.340151802889625E-01,1.007749050898379E+00,-2.428725690505359E-05)
R3 = vector(-3.319485124441679E-01,9.608466316506223E-01,-1.853950030885721E-05)

Now, I have two questions. Will changing the reference plane to "Earth mean equator and equinox of reference epoch" convert the given vectors to equatorial coordinates?

Could someone explain how to convert these vectors from equatorial to ecliptic (either mathematically or in Python)?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
By the way, feel free to assume the tilt of the ecliptic relative to the celestial equator is e=23.44 degrees.
 
It's a simple rotation about the x-axis by the obliquity of the ecliptic at the epoch time, 12:00 UT on January 1, 2000. Rather than 23.44 degrees you would be better of using 84381.448 arc seconds.
 
D H said:
It's a simple rotation about the x-axis by the obliquity of the ecliptic at the epoch time, 12:00 UT on January 1, 2000. Rather than 23.44 degrees you would be better of using 84381.448 arc seconds.

Thank you for the clarification!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top