Calculating Earth's Centripetal Force: Impact on Weight and Direction at 700mph

AI Thread Summary
The centripetal force acting on objects due to Earth's rotation is minimal, with a 1 kg weight experiencing a negligible change in weight when traveling at 700 mph. While the centripetal force can be calculated using the equation f=ma, its impact on a land racer's weight is not significant enough to be noticeable during such speeds. However, the effect can be more pronounced for high-speed aircraft like the Concorde, where passengers felt about 1% lighter flying east due to centripetal acceleration. Additionally, launching spaceships from closer to the equator can leverage this force for better efficiency. Overall, while centripetal force exists, its practical effects on weight at typical speeds are minimal.
ChrisAndre
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Considering Earth spins there is a centripetal force acting on us. How much force is acting on us? Say a 1Kg weight? Can someone give me an equation? Is it significant? I was wondering if land racer would be noticeably lighter or heavier if traveling in one direction or another at 700mph due to increased or decreased centripetal force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can be significant depending on what you're trying to do. It's significant enough to try to launch spaceships from closer to the equator.

Concorde flew fast enough that you would feel about 1% lighter when flying east, due to centripetal acceleration...and another .6% due to height above the earth.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top