EASY Q (Multiplying sign rules)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ASMATHSHELPME
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules Sign
ASMATHSHELPME
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've tottally confused myself over the mutiplying rules.
Can someone please tell me all the rules

+x+ =
-X+ =
+X- =
-X- =

Because I am stupid and keep messing up my polynomials with them.

look forward to posting many easy questions for you guys, Dam some of this stuff is complicated you guys are good.

Thanks in advanced,
AS.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ASMATHSHELPME said:
Hi,

I've tottally confused myself over the mutiplying rules.
Can someone please tell me all the rules

+x+ =
-X+ =
+X- =
-X- =

Because I am stupid and keep messing up my polynomials with them.

look forward to posting many easy questions for you guys, Dam some of this stuff is complicated you guys are good.

Thanks in advanced,
AS.

+x+ = +
-X+ = -
+X- = -
-X- = +

marlon
 
Same signs= positive,

Different signs= negative:

+x+= +
-x- = +
+x- = -
-x+ = -
 
thanks guys, Knew it was easy :) Helped me though, Even if it was easy.

Appreciate the fast reponse.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Same signs= positive,

Different signs= negative:

+x+= +
-x- = +
+x- = -
-x+ = -
I am sorry , but is it really necessary to give the exact same answer that has already been given ? :rolleyes:

marlon
 
making another unnecessry post here but have you checked the times of your response and hallsofivy's? cos it is more than entirely possible he didn't even notice yours.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top