Edward Witten and the Mathematical Multiverse?

AI Thread Summary
Max Tegmark's proposal that every mathematically possible universe exists has garnered positive feedback from notable physicists like Edward Witten. The discussion centers on whether Witten has referenced Tegmark's work in his own papers or talks, particularly regarding the compatibility of Witten's theories with the mathematical multiverse hypothesis. The inquiry also touches on the nature of the universe, questioning whether it is exogenous or endogenous, which could influence the existence of all conceivable mathematical universes. The potential connection between mind and the cosmos is also considered in this context. Overall, the conversation seeks to explore the intersection of Witten's theories and Tegmark's multiverse concept.
Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR Summary
Has Edward Witten made any theory or model that proposes (or is compatible with the proposal) that all mathematically possible universes exist (as Max Tegmark did)?
Physicist Max Tegmark proposed that every mathematically possible universe exists [1]. According to Tegmark himself, when he published such ideas, he received mostly positive feedback from Edward Witten and David Vogan [2].

Due to this, I was wondering whether Witten has made reference to Tegmark's work in any of his papers or talks?. Or, to put it in another way, I was wondering if Witten has made any model or theory in any of his works that would be compatible with this hypothesis that every mathematically possible universe may physically exist?[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0646
[2]: https://www.vice.com/en/article/ezv...ity-an-interview-with-cosmologist-max-tegmark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can check on scholar.google Tegmark's paper and see who has cited it. If Witten has done something on the topic, most likely he would have cited Tegmark.
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary
That depends upon whether the Kosmos is exogenous or endogenous...if the latter, no--every imaginable mathiverse could not exist.
 
...unless mind & Kosmos are one
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top