EE, Node voltages, can't figure out how to reach end result

  • Thread starter Thread starter rod1866
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ee Figure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving for unknown node voltages in an electrical circuit using Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL). The correct node voltages are v1 = 16.97V, v2 = 23.85V, and v3 = 16.06V. The user initially struggled with formulating the equations correctly, particularly with the first equation needing adjustment from (v1 - v3) / 20 to (v1 - v2) / 2. The recommended method for solving the system of equations is algebraic substitution, which simplifies the process of finding the node voltages.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Familiarity with electrical circuit analysis
  • Knowledge of node voltage analysis techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn algebraic substitution methods for solving systems of equations
  • Study advanced circuit analysis techniques using software tools like LTspice
  • Explore node voltage analysis in more complex circuits
  • Review common mistakes in applying KCL to circuit problems
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of node voltage analysis and KCL in electrical circuits.

rod1866
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hey I'm stumped with a question that deals with finding unknown node voltages as I only know how to complete part of the problem. here is the circuit, sorry for the crude MSPaint I do not have a working scanner here.

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/8730/circuiti.png

the answers are

v1 = 16.97V
v2 = 23.85V
v3 = 16.06V

I am stuck trying to figure out how these have been reached

First I tried KCL to get three equations on each of the three unknowns

v1

(v1-v3) / 20 + (v1 - v2) / 20 + v1 / 5 = 0

v2

(v2-v1) / 2 + (v2 - v3) / 5 - 5 = 0

v3

(v3 - v2) / 5 + (v3 - v1) / 20+ v3 / 10 = 0

I was told it is easy to put these together if it is imagined that the arbitrary current directions are thought to be leaving the node, except with v2 where the 5 amps are entering the node. apparently the answer will still be fine at the end of all of this.

at this point I have no clue how they manipulated these equations into finding the node voltages, what I keep reading is "use the equations to solve for node voltages" which means I'm missing something really obvious as they never bother to explain the process used to find the voltages. can someone please tell me what that is, I would really appreciate it as this is definitely the unit of study i need the most help with. thanks for reading.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi rod1866! Welcome to PF! :smile:

You must write each current (I1 I2 I3) on the diagram together with an arrow, or you'll get terribly confused with your pluses and minuses :frown:

which I think is what's happened

(btw, it doesn't matter which way round the arrow is … if you put it the "wrong" way round, you'll simply get an I that comes out negative :wink:)
 
It looks like he's written that for each node, the sum of all currents leaving the node is zero. But they aren't all correct. For starters, the first equation should have (v1 - v2)/2 not /20.

What you need to do here is solve the system of equations. There are several methods. The easiest to understand is algebraic substitution. You essentially want to solve each equation for one variable (either v1, v2 or v3) and then plug it into the next equation.

For example, if I gave you these equations:
x + y = 4
2x + 3y = 6

First, solve for x in the first equation:
x = 4 - y

Then plug that x into the second equation:
2(4 - y) + 3y = 6

And solve for that one variable:
8 - 2y + 3y = 6
y = -2

Plug it back into any of the others:
x + (-2) = 4

so, x = 6.

Essentially, EEs use calculators and computers for circuits with more than 3 non-ground nodes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K