Effect of a charge's own field on itself (Feynman Lec. Vol. [I]-28 )

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the unresolved issue of how a charge's own field affects itself, a problem dating back to the late 19th century. Calculating the field from all charges, including the charge itself, leads to complications, particularly when determining distances that involve division by zero. Despite this gap in understanding, practical applications can often be managed through appropriate approximations, as classical point particles are ultimately just approximations. The Landau-Lifshitz modification of the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation offers a more reliable resolution without the inherent issues of point-particle mechanics. Continuum mechanics is also suggested as a viable alternative to avoid these problems altogether.
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
763
From Feynman's Lectures, Part I , Ch. 28
There was a problem that was not quite solved at the end of the 19th century. When we try to calculate the field from all the charges including the charge itself that we want the field to act on, we get into trouble trying to find the distance, for example, of a charge from itself, and dividing something by that distance, which is zero. The problem of how to handle the part of this field which is generated by the very charge on which we want the field to act is not yet solved today. So we leave it there; we do not have a complete solution to that puzzle yet, and so we shall avoid the puzzle for as long as we can.
Purely in terms of predictive success and useful applications, what kind of physical / practical problems are we not able to calculate because of this gap in our understanding? Have things become clearer in any way, as of 2019?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FAPP there's nothing we can't handle with appropriate approximations. The point is that classical point particles don't exist, i.e., they are at best an approximation. The resolution FAPP is to use not the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation but the modification by Landau and Lifshitz of it, which is accurate to the same order of approximation but doesn't suffer from all the trouble.

Another way out, known for more than 100 years, is not to use point-particle mechanics in relativity at all but only continuum mechanics, where no problems of this kind exist.

For a nice discussion, see

J. Rafelski, Relativity Matters, Springer International
Publishing AG, Cham (2017).
https://dx.doi.org/1007/978-3-319-51231-0
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes kith, Swamp Thing, Delta2 and 1 other person
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top