Effect of Player Size in Distance Hitting Baseball

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimbo Hammock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Baseball
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of player size on the distance a baseball travels when hit. It is posited that a player 10% larger in height and weight could swing a proportionately larger bat, transferring 10% more energy to the ball, resulting in a 10% increase in distance traveled, assuming ideal conditions. However, real-world factors such as wind drag and air resistance complicate this scenario, potentially affecting the flight distance differently based on the ball's speed. Additionally, the conversation highlights that size does not always correlate with strength, emphasizing the role of the central nervous system (CNS) in strength output.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles related to force and energy transfer
  • Familiarity with the concept of wind drag and air resistance
  • Knowledge of the square-cube law and its implications in biomechanics
  • Awareness of the role of the central nervous system in physical performance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the square-cube law and its effects on strength and size in athletes
  • Explore the physics of projectile motion, specifically in sports contexts
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance on different projectile shapes and speeds
  • Study the relationship between muscle mass, CNS efficiency, and strength output in athletes
USEFUL FOR

Sports scientists, baseball coaches, athletes interested in biomechanics, and anyone studying the physics of sports performance.

Jimbo Hammock
An argument arose in our office today concerning the effect that player size has on the distance that a batted ball travels before hitting the ground.

Assuming all factors being equal (humidity, altitude, launch angle, ratio of player muscle/fat/bone/etc, player coordination, etc.), my belief is that if Player B is 10% larger (10% taller, 10% heavier, and therefore 10% stronger) than Player A, Player B would be able to swing a bat that is proportionately 10% larger (10% longer, 10% heavier, and therefore contains 10% more mass) at the exact same speed as Player A swings his smaller bat, and therefore 10% more energy would be transferred into the baseball by Player B, the ball would have a 10% higher velocity, and the ball would fly 10% further, if the experiment were performed in a vacuum.

Is this belief correct, based on the laws of physics?

And, if performed in a real-life setting at the ballpark, would wind-drag/air-resistance be the only additional factor which would slow the baseball and reduce it's flight distance? Would the wind-drag/air resistance slow both balls equally, or would it slow the faster moving ball more, and if so, by how much more?

Thanks for your answers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looking at it other than from a physics perspective, a larger human does not mean a stronger human even if the size difference is purely muscle mass. An example would be Jesse Norris deadlifting 800 pounds while weighing 198 pounds, whereas many 300 pound powerlifters with much higher muscle mass cannot deadlift that. The CNS plays a huge role in strength output, not just the size of the muscles.
 
DS2C said:
Looking at it other than from a physics perspective, a larger human does not mean a stronger human even if the size difference is purely muscle mass. An example would be Jesse Norris deadlifting 800 pounds while weighing 198 pounds, whereas many 300 pound powerlifters with much higher muscle mass cannot deadlift that. The CNS plays a huge role in strength output, not just the size of the muscles.

Thanks, but "other than a physics (scientific?)" perspective, that is a useful reply. Smaller animals (mouse) tens to react (CNS) more quickly than larger animals (elephant)...

Physics pros, why is this so?
 
Jimbo Hammock said:
And, if performed in a real-life setting at the ballpark, would wind-drag/air-resistance be the only additional factor which would slow the baseball and reduce it's flight distance? Would the wind-drag/air resistance slow both balls equally, or would it slow the faster moving ball more, and if so, by how much more?
A lot more goes into ball speed coming off the bat. This Popular Science article hits several of the highlights.
 
Jimbo Hammock said:
10% taller, 10% heavier, and therefore 10% stronger
10% taller (and 10% thicker) is approximately 33% heavier.
10% bigger muscle diameter is approximately 21% stronger.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square–cube_law
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
6K