Hi(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Suppose a closed feedback system has the transfer function

[tex]\frac{C(s)}{R(s)} = \frac{G(s)}{1 + G(s)H(s)}[/tex]

In order to employ Nyquist's method to judge the stability of the system, I consider the loop gain

[tex]L(s) = G(s)H(s)[/tex]

and map the s-plane contour into the [itex]L(s)[/itex] plane. But what if there is a pole of G(s) common with a zero of H(s) (or a zero of G(s) common with a pole of H(s))?

Since the Nyquist plot depends only on the loop gain and not on G and H separately, the effect of this canceled pole-zero pair will not be evident in the L(s)-plane contour. What is the physical significance of this? Does it have a direct relation to the notion of observability in control theory?

In other words, what is the effect of a pole-zero cancellation in the feedforward and feedback transfer functions, on the system vis a vis its stability and other time/frequency domain characteristics?

Thanks in advance.

EDIT: Strictly, I can cancel the pole-zero pair only when I am not at that point. Therefore, the reduced expression (after cancellation) will hold only for those neighborhoods of the s-plane that do not enclose the pole/zero pair. Suppose the pole-zero pair is at s = 0, i.e. G(s) has a pole of order 1 at s = 0 and H(s) has a zero of order 1 at s = 0. Then, L(s) will have no pole or zero at s = 0. But am I supposed to consider a semicircular contour at s = 0 while constructing the Nyquist s-plane contour?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Effect of Pole Zero Cancellation on Nyquist Plot/Stability Criterion

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**