Effective Refractive Index - Should be simple

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the effective refractive index (N) for a dielectric composed of alternating layers with different widths and refractive indices. The initial approach involved calculating the total time for a wave to propagate through the layers, but this method yielded an incorrect value for N. The correct formula for N is derived as N^2 = [A(a*)^2 + B(b*)^2]/(A+B). The confusion arises from not incorporating the optical path length, which accounts for the refractive index multiplied by the physical length of each layer. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurately determining the effective refractive index in layered dielectrics.
nathangrand
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Imagine a dielectric made of of alternating layers of widths A and B and refractive indices (a*) and (b*). Find the effective refractive index, N

So in general: c/n = wavelength x frequency = phase speed

My thinking was find the total time taken for the wave to propagate through the distance A+B and work out the refractive index from this.

So,

Time=distance/speed = (A+B)/(c/N) = (A/(c/a*)) +(B/(c/b*))

But this gives me the wrong value for N

The answer I'm looking for is N^2= [A(a*)^2 + B(b*)^2]/(A+B)

Where am I going wrong?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Is it that I need to use the optical path length..ie refractive index x physical length in my calculations? That will make it work I think but can someone explain why...
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top