Effective Resistance (Fluid Mechanics)

In summary: The down side of this latter approach is that you have to differentiate H numerically to get Q.Maybe one small remark: the resistance in pipe flow is not linear, the head loss ΔH is proportional to the square of the discharge, inserting ΔH=fQ|Q| in the equations will solve the problem correctly, f is the resistance factor depending on pipe length, diameter, cross sectional area and wall surface roughness.
  • #1
blizzardof96
22
0
Imagine you have a vertical pressure head 2m tall with water flowing down to height 0m and emptying. Through this length we have 3 identical tubes of resistance R and length L. Assuming I know the volumetric flow rate(Q) as a function of height, how can I calculate the resistance of each tube? The flow rate decreases linearly with height as the fluid empties and pressure head drops. Should I use the average flow rate on the height interval [0m to 2m] and the max pressure head in my calculation? Or does the resistance change as a function of water level? Intuitively, the tube resistance should be an internal property such that it shouldn't vary. Any guidance would be much appreciated.

Relevant Equations

R=P/Q where P=pgh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Can you please provide a diagram?
 
  • #3
Chestermiller said:
Can you please provide a diagram?

I assume this should be treated like a circuit in series.

image1 (3).jpeg
 

Attachments

  • image1 (3).jpeg
    image1 (3).jpeg
    22 KB · Views: 492
  • #4
Well, your approach is definitely correct. It will help to derive some model equations for this system. This will help to analyze the data. Would you like to begin by writing down some equations? I will be pleased to assist with this.

Chet
 
  • #5
Chestermiller said:
Well, your approach is definitely correct. It will help to derive some model equations for this system. This will help to analyze the data. Would you like to begin by writing down some equations? I will be pleased to assist with this.

Chet

Thank you very kindly. This is what I have so far.

Rtotal = ∑Ri = 3R ("resistors in series")

Q without any resistance is 9.5 x 10^-6 m^3/s

Height (cm) = [13.5 27 40.5 54 67.5 81 94.5 108 121.5 135 148.5 162 175.5]
Flow Rate given 3R (mL/s) = [0.007 0.008 0.009 0.012 0.018 0.025 0.033 0.042 0.052 0.065 0.079 0.0928 0.116]
Flow Rate given 2R (mL/s)= [0.0132 0.024 0.04 0.050 0.066 0.079 0.093 0.104 0.122 0.129 0.134 0.140 0.146]

Note how Q is proportional to height of the water level as it empties.

Now we need to use R = P/Q = pgh/Q. How would you proceed?
 
  • #6
I would do something like this: The relationship between the rate of change of height and the flow rate is $$A\frac{dh}{dt}=-Q$$where A is the cross sectional area of the vertical pipe. The pressure at the bottom of the vertical pipe is $$p=\rho g h$$The relationship between the pressure and the flow rate is the one you have given: $$Q=\frac{p}{R}$$So, if we eliminate p and Q from these equations, we obtain:$$A\frac{dh}{dt}=-\frac{\rho gh}{R}$$The solution to this differential equation is $$h=h_0e^{-\frac{\rho gt}{AR}}$$ So, of up plot h vs t on a semi-log plot (i.e., using a semilog scale for h), you should obtain a straight line with a slope of ##\frac{\rho g}{AR}##. From this slope, you can determine R. Following this approach would allow you to include all the data at once.
 
  • #7
Chestermiller said:
I would do something like this: The relationship between the rate of change of height and the flow rate is $$A\frac{dh}{dt}=-Q$$where A is the cross sectional area of the vertical pipe. The pressure at the bottom of the vertical pipe is $$p=\rho g h$$The relationship between the pressure and the flow rate is the one you have given: $$Q=\frac{p}{R}$$So, if we eliminate p and Q from these equations, we obtain:$$A\frac{dh}{dt}=-\frac{\rho gh}{R}$$The solution to this differential equation is $$h=h_0e^{-\frac{\rho gt}{AR}}$$ So, of up plot h vs t on a semi-log plot (i.e., using a semilog scale for h), you should obtain a straight line with a slope of ##\frac{\rho g}{AR}##. From this slope, you can determine R. Following this approach would allow you to include all the data at once.

Thank you. This is helpful. The other alternative is to assume that (1/Rtot) is slope "m" if you plot H vs Q with H along the x axis.
 
  • #8
blizzardof96 said:
Thank you. This is helpful. The other alternative is to assume that (1/Rtot) is slope "m" if you plot H vs Q with H along the x axis.
The down side of this latter approach is that you have to differentiate H numerically to get Q.
 
  • #9
Maybe one small remark: the resistance in pipe flow is not linear, the head loss ΔH is proportional to the square of the discharge, inserting ΔH=fQ|Q| in the equations will solve the problem correctly, f is the resistance factor depending on pipe length, diameter, cross sectional area and wall surface roughness.
upload_2018-11-7_16-5-30.png

and
upload_2018-11-7_16-6-9.png

So you obtain the following differential equation:
upload_2018-11-7_16-8-0.png

Which leads to the following solution:
upload_2018-11-7_16-20-54.png


with ΔH(0) the head at t=t0
There is one import restriction to this approach: the surface area A should be much larger than the cross-sectional area of the pipes (it is implicitly assumed that the flow velocity in the reservoir is much smaller that the flow velocity in the pipes. When you want to determine the resistance factor of the three individual pipes you will need to do additional measurements with respect to the head loss over each individual pipe.). The above approach only results in the overall resistance for the combination of them. (I just hope the equations are readable, I have some trouble to get them readable in this post).
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-11-7_16-5-30.png
    upload_2018-11-7_16-5-30.png
    518 bytes · Views: 496
  • upload_2018-11-7_16-6-9.png
    upload_2018-11-7_16-6-9.png
    523 bytes · Views: 509
  • upload_2018-11-7_16-8-0.png
    upload_2018-11-7_16-8-0.png
    733 bytes · Views: 504
  • upload_2018-11-7_16-9-53.png
    upload_2018-11-7_16-9-53.png
    1 KB · Views: 380
  • upload_2018-11-7_16-20-54.png
    upload_2018-11-7_16-20-54.png
    1,023 bytes · Views: 498

1. What is effective resistance in fluid mechanics?

Effective resistance in fluid mechanics is a measure of the force required to overcome the resistance of a fluid when it is in motion. It takes into account factors such as viscosity, surface tension, and turbulence in determining the overall resistance of a fluid.

2. How is effective resistance different from overall resistance?

Effective resistance takes into account the complex nature of fluid flow, while overall resistance only considers the simple relationship between force and velocity. Effective resistance is a more accurate measure of the actual resistance experienced by a fluid in motion.

3. How is effective resistance calculated?

Effective resistance is calculated using the Darcy-Weisbach equation, which takes into account the fluid's density, velocity, and the characteristics of the pipe or channel through which it is flowing. It also considers factors such as roughness and friction in the pipe or channel walls.

4. What factors affect effective resistance?

Effective resistance is affected by a variety of factors, including the fluid's viscosity, density, and velocity, as well as the size and shape of the channel or pipe it is flowing through. Other factors such as roughness of the channel walls and the presence of obstacles can also impact effective resistance.

5. How can effective resistance be reduced?

Effective resistance can be reduced by decreasing the fluid's velocity, increasing the diameter of the channel or pipe, or by using smoother surfaces to reduce friction. Additionally, using laminar flow instead of turbulent flow can also decrease effective resistance. However, these changes may also impact the overall flow rate and pressure of the fluid.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • General Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
828
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
312
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
731
Back
Top