Effective resistance of truncated conical cylinder

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the effective resistance of a truncated conical cylinder made of graphite, characterized by a bulk resistivity of ρ = 1/σ. The top radius is denoted as r = a and the bottom radius as r = b, with the condition that b > a. The effective resistance is derived using the integration of resistive disks in series, leading to the formula R = ρL / (πab), which simplifies to the standard resistance formula when a equals b. The relationship between radius and height is established as r = a + (h(b-a)/L).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical resistance and resistivity concepts.
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Knowledge of geometric properties of conical shapes.
  • Basic principles of electric fields and potential difference.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of resistance formulas for different geometric shapes.
  • Learn about the application of calculus in physics, particularly in electrical engineering.
  • Explore the relationship between resistivity and conductivity in materials.
  • Investigate the concept of electric fields in non-uniform materials.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists dealing with material properties, and anyone interested in advanced topics in electrical resistance calculations.

meteorologist1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having trouble doing this problem:
A truncated conical cylinder of graphite (bulk resistivity \rho = 1/\sigma). The top of the cylinder has radius r = a, the bottom has r = b (b>a). Find the effective resistance between top and bottom of the cylinder. Show that the expression reduces to the usual one (R = \rho L / A) when a = b.

I know I need to do some kind of integration from a to b, but I really don't know how to set this up. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just treat all the tiny cross sections as a bunch of resistors in series. That is, get the resistance for each one in terms of p, r (which goes from a to b), and dy, and integrate over y.
 
Last edited:
The professor said we shouldn't need to solve Laplace's equation for this problem. I'm thinking the effective resistance is the sum of resistive disks in series. And the integration would be integrating the height from 0 to L.

But first of all, the potential at a point z in between 0 and L would be just V(z) = (Vo/L)z, and therefore E = -Vo/L in the z-direction.

About the integration, do I have to both integrate the radius from a to b AND the height from 0 to L. Or should there be some kind of relationship between the radius and height (radius as a function of height)?
 
Ok, by doing sum of resistive disks, I got to this point:
dR = \frac{\rho dz}{\pi r^2}
where r is the radius of a disk at height dz. The problem now is how to relate r and z because I'm pretty sure there's a dependence between radius and height. thanks.
 
yea sorry about that, I realized there was a much easier way.

Well r goes from a to b linearly as h goes from 0 to L, that's just the equation for a line. r = (b-a) h/L
 
It's still not working out. r = b - (b-a)z/L, but I could not get the right resistance expression when a = b. There must be something wrong with this r expression.
 
Nevermind. I made a mistake in the integration. It came out to be this:
R = \frac{\rho L}{\pi ab}

Thanks.
 
What is z?

If you measure h from top,

r = a + \frac{h(b-a)}{L}
 
His "z" is nearly the same as your "h", except he's measuring from the other end.
 

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
621
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K