Calculating Efficiency of a Heat Engine: Converting Celsius to Kelvin

Click For Summary
To calculate the efficiency of a heat engine, temperatures must be converted from Celsius to Kelvin using the formula eff = [1 - (T cold/T hot)] * 100. An example calculation shows that for T cold at 302°C (incorrectly noted as 593K, should be 575K) and T hot at 610°C (883K), the efficiency is approximately 32.8%. It's important to note that this formula represents the efficiency of an ideal heat engine, while real engines will have lower efficiency. The discussion highlights the necessity of accurate temperature conversion for proper efficiency calculations. Overall, precision in temperature values is crucial for determining heat engine efficiency.
cowgiljl
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
when i am calculating the eggiciency of a heat engine i have to convert the celicus to kelvis and used this formula

eff = 1-(T cold/T hot)*100

fro example 302C = 593K 610C = 883K

eff = 1-593/883 = about 32.8% efficient

right ?

thanks joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by cowgiljl
eff = 1-(T cold/T hot)*100
You mean: eff = [1-(T cold/T hot)]*100.

This is the efficiency of an ideal (reversible) heat engine; real engines will be less efficient.
...
eff = 1-593/883 = about 32.8% efficient
Right.
 
Originally posted by cowgiljl
fro example 302C = 593K

Nope, 302+273=575.
 
it was 320 not 302 but thanks
 


Originally posted by Tom
Nope, 302+273=575.
Good catch, Tom. :smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K