Efficiency of an inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the efficiency of inclined planes, specifically identifying factors that cause efficiency to be less than 100%. Friction is highlighted as a primary factor, as it generates thermal energy and requires additional applied force to overcome both static and kinetic friction. The conversation also suggests that heat generation and the ramp's surface material contribute to energy loss, linking them to the friction experienced. The geometry of the ramp is mentioned as another significant factor affecting the friction force that must be overcome. Overall, understanding these factors is essential for analyzing the efficiency of inclined planes in physics.
pfk123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


List 2 major factors result in an efficiency of less than 100% when using an inclined plane to raise a mass

Note - this is a grade 11 lab so don't have answers that are too advanced please :D

Homework Equations


eff = eout/ein x 100%
... = mghf/fd x 100%

The Attempt at a Solution


I listed friction as one with the explanation: friction (thermal energy) when the block with mass was being pulled up the inclined plane, it experiences a force of kinetic friction opposite to the applied force. This is a result of the chemical bonding between surfaces. Since W = Fd, an increase in applied force was needed at first to overcome static friction, then kinetic friction after. An increase in applied force will result in an increase of work as they are proportional and the displacement did not change. Since friction can never be fully eliminated and is usually not the useful energy, there will be efficiency that is less than 100%.

I have no clue what the 2nd major factor is though. It was not sound as it was a small block and didn't make noise going up the ramp. Should I just use sound as my second factor?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
pfk123, welcome to PF!
Your explanation of friction as a major factor in efficiency loss is very good.

Regarding the 2nd factor, you mentioned sound. There is also heat generated. And other forms of energy. But all these forms of energy are a result of the work done by friction, so these losses are sort of tied together as the same factor. There is another factor that relates to the magnitude of the friction force that must be overcome. It has to do with the ramp geometry. Can you think what it might be? And there is another large factor relating to the friction force magnitude...think about the ramp surface... both these factors are subfactors of your friction explanation
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top