Efficient Venturi Tube Calibration for Digital Peak Flowmeters | Thesis Design

AI Thread Summary
A venturi tube has been designed for a digital peak flowmeter, but the calibration process is challenging without a measured flowrate device, resulting in a 12.3% error between theoretical and experimental flow rates. Theoretical flow is 610 L/min, while experimental measurements show 535 L/min. Concerns were raised about the impact of fluid nature on calibration accuracy. Comparisons with other peak flow meters indicate varying error rates, suggesting that accuracy can differ significantly among devices. The discussion concludes with a request for methods to calibrate the results effectively.
CadisEtramaDiRaizel
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I've designed a venturi tube for my thesis ( Design of a digital peak flowmeter). I was wondering if there was a way to calibrate the flowrate, without using a measured flowrate producing device. The current error is about 12.3%. Theoretical 610L/min vs experimental 535L/min.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Bucket
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters
CadisEtramaDiRaizel said:
Theoretical 610L/min vs experimental 535L/min.

Big bucket.
 
  • Like
Likes Nidum
CWatters said:
Big bucket.
But it's airflow, wouldn't the nature of the fluid ( being water or any other liquid) impact calibration?
 
CadisEtramaDiRaizel said:
I've designed a venturi tube for my thesis ( Design of a digital peak flowmeter). I was wondering if there was a way to calibrate the flowrate, without using a measured flowrate producing device. The current error is about 12.3%. Theoretical 610L/min vs experimental 535L/min.
Forgot to add, that it's used to check asthma parameters
 
What did you use to calculate the current error rate?
 
So you compared the flow rate recorded by your new digital peak flowmeter with the flow rate measured by another device and recorded on a chart?

How do you know which is more accurate?

Google found..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882540/

"Comparison of five portable peak flow meters"

From the Results..

"The percent error for the spirometric values for each meter was 5.1% for Air Zone®, 1.9% for Assess®, 11.2% for Galemed®, 6.5% for Personal Best® and 3.0% for Vitalograph®."
 
CWatters said:
So you compared the flow rate recorded by your new digital peak flowmeter with the flow rate measured by another device and recorded on a chart?

How do you know which is more accurate?

Google found..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882540/

"Comparison of five portable peak flow meters"

From the Results..

"The percent error for the spirometric values for each meter was 5.1% for Air Zone®, 1.9% for Assess®, 11.2% for Galemed®, 6.5% for Personal Best® and 3.0% for Vitalograph®."
Then how do I calibrate my results? Thanks
 

Similar threads

Back
Top