Eigen Value and Eigen Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter roshan2004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Value
roshan2004
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
I know that the eigen equation is given by A\psi =\lambda\psi where A is an operator and \psi is an eigen function and \lambda is an eigen value.
For the particle in an infinite square well of width L the wavefunction is given by \psi (x)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}sin(\frac{n\pi x}{L}) and the energy is given by E=\frac{n^2h^2}{8ml^2}
I want to know why \psi is called eigen function and E is called the eigen value.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From German eigen, meaning "distinct", "particular", "[one's] own".

It comes by analogy to linear algebra. If a vector \vec{v} is such that when you multiply a matrix A, by it, you get back the same matrix multiplied by some scalar (lambda):
\mathbf{A}\vec{v} = \lambda\mathbf{A}
Then \vec{v} is an eigenvector of A, and \lambda the corresponding eigenvalue. Any linear algebra textbook will tell you all about it.

This concept can be generalized to linear operators (matrix multiplication being a linear operation). For a linear operator \hat{O}, and a function f, if:
\hat{O}f = \lambda f

Then f is an eigenfunction of \hat{O}, and \lambda is again the corresponding eigenvalue. If you have a given operator and some boundary conditions, and wish to find the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues for it, then that's called an "eigenvalue problem".

For instance, the differential operator \hat{D}^n = \frac{d^n}{d x^n} is a linear operator.
So differential equations, such as \frac{df}{d x} - \lambda f(x) = 0 are eigenvalue problems.
 
hi roshan2004! :smile:

(have a psi: ψ and a lambda: λ and a pi: π and a square-root: √ and a curly d: ∂ :wink:)

your wavefunction should also have an eiωt factor

the (energy) operator A is ih∂/∂t (where I'm writing h for h-bar = h/2π),

so the (energy) eigenvalue is hω

(which just happens to be h(nπ/L)2/2m = h2n2/8mL2

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_well" :wink:)​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks, but in this case I couldnot find operator here, which is the operator in this case?
 
roshan2004 said:
Thanks, but in this case I couldnot find operator here, which is the operator in this case?

The Hamiltonian. The time-independent Schrödinger equation is simply the eigenvalue problem for the Hamiltonian.
Also, since V = 0 and you only have one dimension in the infinite square well, the Hamiltonian in that case is just the second-order differential operator (multiplied by -\hbar/2m)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top