Eigen Vectors, Geometric Multiplicities and more....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A matrix is diagonalizable if and only if the sum of the geometric multiplicities of its eigenvalues equals the size of the matrix. Geometric multiplicity refers to the dimension of the solution space for the equation Ax = λx for each eigenvalue λ. For a 3x3 matrix with three unique eigenvalues, the sum of the geometric multiplicities must equal 3, confirming that the matrix is diagonalizable. If the sum is less than the size of the matrix, the matrix cannot be diagonalized, indicating that the matrix P formed from the eigenvectors will not be invertible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Familiarity with matrix diagonalization
  • Knowledge of geometric multiplicity
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra
  • Learn about matrix diagonalization techniques and their applications
  • Explore the relationship between geometric multiplicity and algebraic multiplicity
  • Investigate the implications of diagonalizable matrices in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, matrix theory, or anyone seeking to understand the conditions for matrix diagonalization.

Bullington
Gold Member
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
My professor states that "A matrix is diagonalizable if and only if the sum of the geometric multiplicities of the eigen values equals the size of the matrix". I have to prove this and proofs are my biggest weakness; but, I understand that geometric multiplicites means the dimensions of the solution space for the equation Ax=λx (right?). But what does the "sum of the geometric multiplicities" mean? Could you point me in the right direction, thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bullington said:
(right?)
geometric multiplicity is the dimension of the solution space of ##\vec{\vec A}\vec x = \lambda_i \vec x## for one ##\lambda_i##. add them up for all ##i## and you get the sum of the geometric multiplicities, which you are asked to prove is equal to the size of A.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bullington
How could I add up the dimensions? So for a 3x3 matrix that has three unique eigen vectors would I say that the dimension each of the eigen spaces is 3 and the sum of the geometric multiplicities is 3? Then would I say that A would have to be a square matrix of order 3?
 
Is this in the right direction:
In order for a matrix “A” to be diagonalizable then there is an equation such that P-1AP=D where D is the diagonalized matrix and P is the matrix formed from the Eigenvectors of A and if the sum of the geometric multiplicities is less than the size of A then P will not be invertible? Am I too far off, or did I assume something I shouldn't have?
 
Bullington said:
How could I add up the dimensions? So for a 3x3 matrix that has three unique eigen vectors would I say that the dimension each of the eigen spaces is 3 and the sum of the geometric multiplicities is 3? Then would I say that A would have to be a square matrix of order 3?
No, if an eigenvector ##\vec x## has a unique eigenvalue ##\lambda_x##, all multiples of that vector have the property ##
\vec{\vec A}(p \vec x) = \lambda_x (p\vec x)\ ## (p a real number) so the dimension of the solution space is 1. Three unique eigenvalues let that add up to 3.

If two vectors ##\vec x## and ##\vec y## have the same ##\lambda##, then ##p\vec x + q\vec y## has that too and the solution space for that degenerate eigenvalue has dimension 2. One other plus these 2 adds up to 3.
 
=> A is diagonalizable : ##A \sim \begin{pmatrix}\lambda_1 \text{ Id}_{m_1} & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \ddots & 0\\
0 & 0 & \lambda_p \text{ Id}_{m_p} \end{pmatrix}##. What is ##m_1,...,m_p## ? What is ##m_1 + ... + m_p ## equal to ?

<= Say that matrix A represents an endomorphism on vector space ##E##. You are given that ## \text{dim}(E_{\lambda_1}) + ... + \text{dim}(E_{\lambda_p}) = \text{dim}(E) ##. Can you show that ##E=E_{\lambda_1} \bigoplus ... \bigoplus E_{\lambda_p} ## ? How does this prove that their exists a basis of ##E## in which A is diagonal ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K