Eigenblades and the Geometric Algebra of Spinors

In summary: However, when we consider the real linear space as a real geometric algebra, the extension is instead:$$V_\mathbb{C} = V \otimes_\mathbb{R} \mathbb{C} \cong \mathcal{C}\ell_2(\mathbb{R})$$This means that instead of using complex coefficients, we can use the geometric product of the GA to represent complex numbers and perform operations. This approach is much more intuitive and elegant, especially when dealing with linear transformations that involve complex numbers. It also allows for a better understanding of how these transformations act on different subspaces, such as planes. These methods are not widely discussed in the literature, but they offer a powerful way to
  • #1
kryptyk
41
0
I've been looking into Geometric Algebra approaches to linear transformations and have found it to be MUCH nicer than the conventional matrix approaches for certain kinds of transformations. Moreover, I find it much more intuitive, particularly in its way of dealing with complex numbers.

For instance, consider some linear operator [tex]M[/tex] from [tex]R^n[/tex] to [tex]R^n[/tex]. If all its eigenvalues are real, it is easy enough to see how it acts on linear subspaces. But how are we to geometrically interpret complex eigenvalues and their corresponding eigenvectors?

If [tex]n=2[/tex], this is relatively simple. We can treat complex eigenvalues as scalings and rotations on the plane. In fact, we can use the following isomorphism between [tex]C[/tex] and [tex]2 \times 2[/tex] antisymmetrical matrices over [tex]R \;[/tex]:

[tex]a + i b \longleftrightarrow \left(\begin{array}{cc}a&-b\\b&a\end{array}\right)[/tex]

But the use of eigenvectors with complex-valued coordinates can get quite ugly - especially when dealing with spaces of greater dimension than 2. Especially if we're only interested in how the operator acts on real vectors.

However, while we cannot generally identify rotations with real eigenvectors, we can identify rotations with real eigenbivectors where the eigenbivectors represent plane elements rather than line elements. The corresponding eigenvalues then express a scaling of areas rather than lengths. This then extends naturally to higher dimensions.

Moreover, GA provides a way to express any linear map as a geometric product without the use of any matrices. Certain kinds of maps, such as rotations and reflections, afford extremely simple representations in this way that not only more clearly illustrate the essence of the map but also are much less tedious to work with than matrices. These ideas are so extremely powerful I'm surprised they are seldom mentioned in the literature.

I was wondering if anyone here is familiar with these methods, and even if not, if anyone would be interested in looking further into these methods with me.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Formally the extension of a real linear space ##V##, e.g. a matrix space, can be seen as a tensor product:
$$
V_\mathbb{C} = V \otimes_\mathbb{R} \mathbb{C}
$$
It is called complexification and a standard method to go from real to complex.
 

1. What are Eigenblades in the context of geometric algebra and spinors?

Eigenblades are geometric objects that represent the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a linear transformation in the context of geometric algebra. They are extremely useful in representing rotations and other transformations in 3D space.

2. How are spinors related to geometric algebra?

Spinors are complex numbers that are used to represent rotations and other transformations in geometric algebra. They are closely related to the concept of eigenblades, as they are used to construct them.

3. How do eigenblades and spinors differ from traditional methods of representing rotations?

Eigenblades and spinors offer a more elegant and efficient way of representing rotations compared to traditional methods such as matrices and quaternions. They also have the advantage of being able to represent any arbitrary rotation, rather than being limited to rotations around a fixed axis.

4. How are eigenblades and spinors used in practical applications?

Eigenblades and spinors have a wide range of applications in fields such as computer graphics, robotics, and physics. They are used to represent and manipulate rotations and other transformations in 3D space, making them valuable tools in these areas.

5. Are there any limitations to using eigenblades and spinors?

One limitation of using eigenblades and spinors is that they can be difficult to visualize and understand intuitively. They also require a solid understanding of geometric algebra and its concepts in order to use them effectively. Additionally, they may not be the most efficient method for representing certain types of transformations, such as translations.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
879
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
864
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
3
Views
463
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
928
Back
Top