Eigenfunction/Eigenvalue question

  • Thread starter Thread starter noahcharris
  • Start date Start date
noahcharris
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

So I was watching an MIT OCW video on intro QM and came across this 'clicker' question. (Shows up at 4:45)


Apparently the correct answer is B, but C looks valid to me as well. Could someone explain why C is incorrect?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work it out with pencil and paper carefully, and you'll see that there are only two combinations that work.
 
  • Like
Likes noahcharris
Oh wow, I seriously misread the question... Thank you. This thread should be closed probably.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top