Help with Eigenfunction Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter adi_butler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenfunction
adi_butler
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am a little stuck understanding and answering the following questions. Can anyone help me with them?



"A system has four eigenstates of an observable, with corresponding eigenvalues 3/2, 1/2, -1/2 and -3/2, and normalized eigenfunctions
Psi_{3/2}, Psi_{1/2}, Psi_{-1/2} and Psi_{-3/2} respectively. (cant get tex to work properly)

Measurements of the observable are made on three systems that are all in the same superposition state, and yield the values 3/2, -1/2 and -3/2"

1)What can you say about the state of the system after each measurement?

2)What can you say about the original superposition state?

3)If many measurements on systems that are all in the same superposition state never yield the result -1/2, and give the result 3/2 twice as often as the other two possible results, deduce the normalized form of the superposition state

4)What is the expectation value of the observable in this state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show what you've done so far and where your stuck
 
Well I am new to quantum and i missed the lecture explaining what eigenvalues and eigenstates are, I've heard of them before but have no idea what they are
 
Questions

Well, you should probably have a read of your textbook because eigenvalues and eigenvectors are pretty important for understanding QM. It's probably not appropriate to answer your homework for you, but here is a summary of what you need to know:

- Observables in QM are represented by hermitian operators, H.

- The eigenstates of H are the solutions to the following equation:

H Psi = h Psi

where Psi is a vector, called an eigenvector of H, and h is just a number, called an eigenvalue of H.

- Let's label the distinct solutions to this equation by an index j, i.e. as Psi_j and h_j

- QM says that when H is measured, the answer is always one of the eigenvalues h_j. After the measurement, the state will become the corresponding eigenstate Psi_j.

- Further, is the initial state is Phi, then the probability of obtaining the value h_j is: |<Psi_j|Phi>|^2

- The Psi_j's usually form a complete orthonormal basis (although one has to be a bit careful when H is degenerate, i.e. when there is more than one Psi_j corresponding to a particular value of h_j). Therfore, the initial state can be written in terms of the eigenvectors:

Phi = \sum_j a_j Psi_j

and then

|<Psi_j|Phi>|^2 = |a_j|^2


That should be enough to answer your questions
 
Thank you slyboy, it wasnt my homework its a question from a past paper that i didnt have a clue about. I didnt realize how easy the question was, doesn't actually require a lot of work at all! Thanks for the help
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top